09-27-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

been presented to the Joint Advisory Committee prior to August 1 for discussion and review. Although it is expected that the Annual Budget Package which is provided to the Contracting Cities by the City of Orono will have the consensus support of the Joint Advisory Committee, that is not a requirement since each Contracting City has Che opportunity for final ratification or rejection. r-.-.php.irf Payments. The City Budget Share (See Appendix A) of each Contracting City shall be paid in equal quarterly installments on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of Che next contract year by the Contracting City to the City of Orono. Orono agrees to provide the Contract Cities with reasonably jjgtailed information relating to its estimated expenditures its actual expenditures so as to adequately inform them of the basis for the calculation of billings made by Orono. Under the provisions of this contract, Orono agrees to make its records available to the Contract Cities for inspection for the purpose of determining the basis for the calculations Orono under the provisions of this section. 17. Arbitration. If the Contracting City is aggrieved by the determination of the City of Orono as to the allocation of the actual costs of the prior year's service, the Contracting City may appeal said determination within 30 days after receipt^of the City of Orono's audit. Said appeal shall be in writing and shall b. addressed to the City of Orono asking for arbitration by a board of arbitration. The Board o Arbitration shall consist of three persons; one to be appointed by the City of Orono, one to be appointed by the appealing Contracting City, and the third to be appointee y th<? two ro ro}rcAr>a. The of cich arbitrator shall be submitted in wiiting to the other party. In the event the two arbitrators so selected do not appoint the third arbitrator within 15 days after receipt of written notice of appointment of either of the first two arbiti^cors, t e it- Judge of the District Court of Hennepin County ® * rtrv jurisdiction to appoint, upon application of either t * of Orono or the appealing Contracting City, ^ * u arbitrator to the Board. The third arbitrator not be a resident of either Contracting City, and shall Page 10 { - I