My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
09-27-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2024 11:09:54 AM
Creation date
1/16/2024 11:06:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SERI EMBER 13, 1993 <br />(#4) #1803 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - FINAL <br />SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3318 <br />Bob Mitchcil was present representing the applicants. <br />Mabusth explained that in the preliminary plat there was no Outlot D so there was no issue <br />raised regarding the outlot. In the final plat, Outlot D appeared. In the original re.solution, it <br />was stated that Outlot B could be legally combined with the Carpenter property or the adjacent <br />property. Mitchell has asked that the outlot be legally combined with Lot 1, Block 1. Tlie <br />amended resolution, Page 2, Condition 2, reads "As Outlot D is unbuildable and relates closely <br />to Lot 1, Block 1 and is not contiguous to any other property owned by the developer, Outlot <br />D and Lot 1, Block 1 shall be deemed combined for Orono’s subdivision and land use purposes <br />with the execution of a special lot combination." <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3318 as amended. Ayes <br />4, navs 0. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Charles Nolan represented the Planning Commission. There were no comments. <br />PUBUC COMMENTS <br />Marne O’Meara, 2000 Webber Hills Road, explained that while recently purchasing their home <br />they had to deal with the new septic regulations. Since their system did not comply, they were <br />given two years to upgrade the system. Because they purchased the home under foreclosure, <br />a complicated purchase agreement was written. Funds were in escrow for a septic system. <br />Once they moved in, the septic moratorium was imposed. She is asking for two things: <br />1) Several neighborhoods are being considered for sewer. She would like an <br />expedient decision on whether or not sewer will be utilized in the Webber Hills <br />area. <br />2)If septic systems are to continue in Webber Hills, she would like to be allowed <br />an exception to the moratorium to proceed with the upgrade of their system so <br />they can comply with the stipulations of their purchase agreement. <br />Mayor Callalian explained that the moratorium is only for preventing the City from enforcing <br />the septic ordinance; it docs nt^f prevent anyone from prtxieeding w ith the installation of a septic <br />svstem.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.