Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN( <br />HELD AUGUST 16, 1993 <br />ZONING KILE #1849 - CONT. <br />Mabuslh added that a staff inspection would be done before final subdivision appnwal to see if <br />all the conditions had been met. <br />It was moved by Smith, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of Application #1849 for <br />the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T. Lund, 111, 905 Tonkawa Road, as proposed and <br />allows for vacation of the sewer easement as indicated. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />(#7) #1829 DIANE SIEFF, <br />1080 WILDHURST TRAIL - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF <br />PUBLIC HEARING - 8:21 TO 8:50 <br />Diane Sieff and Gerald Sieff, her .son, were present. <br />Mabustli e.xplained the application had been tabled at the July 19th meetintj to provide Mrs. Sieff <br />time to consider additional hardcover removals. An amended application has been received <br />indicating the removal of 84 s.f. from th** ^^-75 ’. Sea walls or rip rap remain at 76 s.f. which <br />are not counted as hardcover in the 0-75 setback area*. Based on policy, there is 0 s.f. of <br />hardcover within the 0-75' area. In the 75-250 ’ setback area, the applicant proposes the removal <br />of plastic underliner beneath the rose bed planters in the lakeshore yard and cement pads. The <br />8 ’x20’ new structure results in 160 s.f. of strucmral hardcover and applicant proposes removal <br />of nonstructural hardcover at 391.4 s.f. <br />Chair Schroeder asked applicant if additional hardcover could be removed in the driveway area? <br />Mrs. Sieff replied that pan of the driveway is shared by her neighbor during bad weather. <br />Chair Schroeder questioned the possibility of driveway reduction in the area closv*- to the <br />attached earage <br />Mabusth asked if it could be reduce ’ where the do meet? <br />Mrs. Sieff did not agree <br />Chair Schroeder stated the removal i)f plastic underliner is a good step but is difficult to count <br />as a reduction. <br />Mrs. Sieff asked if nonstructural hardcover is counted against her in the hardcover study, why <br />can ’t it be counted as a removal'.’