Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DAIE: <br />Planning Conmission and Comcil #24 C% <br />Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator <br />March 16, 1977 <br />SUBJECT: North Star Marina - 3324 North Shore Drive <br />Conditional Use Permit and Riprap <br />North Star Marina originally submitted plans for a building addition and seawall <br />in 1975, The proposal was approved with several conditions. One being riprap <br />rather than a seawall. The proposal was renewed in 1976. <br />The low water level of the lake along with the erosion of silt through the years <br />has created a problem for this year’s docking operations. The applicant is, <br />therefore, requesting approval for the removal of the erosion and installation <br />of riprap to protect against further erosion. He contends that this removal of <br />silt is a shoreline maintenance project only. He has submitted several j^otos <br />as evidence. <br />The specifications for the project include removal of the silt from the property. <br />Maps and specs are enclosed. I'm also enclosing copies of the Council minutes <br />of Septenfcer 23, 1975. <br />I don’t know the status of the docks that exceed the IMCD 200' limit. I believe <br />LMCD has decided to enforce this limit this year, 1 don’t know if any of the <br />marinas are objecting to this enforcement. <br />Don Murphy of the Hennepin County Pii>lic Works Department just called me on <br />March 15, 1977, to confiim their intent to cooperate to some extent on projected <br />improvements along County Roads abutting marinas. County procedures involve <br />T^re departments and more red tape before decisions are reached. <br />PLANNING COhMISSION fCETING - March 21, 1977 <br />Work Session item. Paul Kenpf was present. After reviewing his proposal, the <br />Planning Comnission requested that the applicant submit a report fixmi the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District concerning the extent of build up of the <br />eroded materi^. The applicant was forewarned that the only dredging that <br />would be permitted was that portion that has eroded through the years. The <br />Conmission also requested that the applicant submit a copy of the action taken <br />by the LMCD at their mating this week regarding dock lengths. The Coimdssion <br />reconmended that the City Engineer supervise this dredging. <br />PLANNING CCMNnSSICN KEETING - April 4, 1977 <br />Three parties representing nearby property owners were in attendance. They were <br />especis'^ly concerned about the dredging and the affect this would have on the <br />neighboring properties. <br />It was suggested that the applicant include in his proposal consideraticxi of <br />reducing the dock lengths to the 200’ LMCD regulation to justify the proposed <br />dredging for docks that would be lost in the cut back. The applicant felt this <br />was unjust and at present would not consider cutting back the docks. <br />THk <br />f <br />r-