Laserfiche WebLink
equest, <br />y owner <br />he Interests <br />will be <br />ro. He can’t <br />be sterile <br />^joining <br />is may <br />ips Impos- <br />>ned off <br />one can’t <br />i taxes. <br />IS the <br />ear title, <br />land or <br />is not <br />0 years <br />largest <br />. Prior <br />Quse on <br />a of the <br />sed for <br />:he fact <br />: in an <br />If the <br />ance. <br />Factors <br />e community <br />owing <br />llze the <br />ial <br />ling <br />Its <br />>nnnunlty, <br />there <br />} <br />^. .1 <br />..I <br />H <br />-3- <br />of environmental concern. It obstruc ts no one’s view <br />hfve their o^r "»st <br />severli of fhrne^bl! P^^tersen has spoken with <br />or ?; ^ neighboring property owners and none have expressed any concernor objections about his proposed house. ^ concern <br />obiectlve expressed is their planningoDjective, which, if analyzed, is not significant in this case. One must <br />feinember that this wl.ole neighborhood was platted in 1885 and developed years <br />hroH ^ foo” ^ zoning code. The character of the neighbor- <br />whcn T established in the first half of thL century <br />confom^wlTLn?r property. UTiile this neighborhood may not <br />nor with contemporary planning standards of lot size and width, this is <br />neiolT ^ ‘ ^signed neighborhood. The character and design of this <br />neighborhood were struck in the early 1900’s when this property was platted <br />noteH^'"^^??^^’ * except Mr. Petersen's, are 50-foot lotL As <br />tu^^toir fhls fi', ’’rr'*"" ® subdivision U„tor- <br />develoDod JL standard when this subdivision was platted and <br />ev^loped. I m sure everyone wishes that the lots were bigper and that tbp <br />?ate rte°" Trl <iifferently, but that is Imposslblf to So this <br />which is part of^a"subdi^^*^J*^^^ ^a planning objectives on a lot <br />nnpH a ^ subdivxslon and neighborhood which was planned and devel- <br />to objectives in 1900. Refusing to allow Mr. Petersen <br />rrL™ <br />thL®thraiera^rr" "«ighborhood?®“r!“aters‘e^ <br />p-neral^ average ot in that subdivision and is in conformance with the <br />denLfatL'laicI: should not be <br />% <br />nn^ srunt a variance In tbls case, it does <br />not necessarily mean that any substandard lot would be entitled to a variance <br />e^tr o-%\’’to ‘fr-t°a irrlaTeTo^e-^^ <br />prLent cLe!° “ ® --1®"®® wore grLted In the <br />suonary, the equities in the present case clearly warrant <br />be%?bU«ry® ^MpMcw!"’' ^ <br />Respectfully submitted. <br />' '/ <br />V <br />/A <br />Douglas'e. Klint <br />DEK:JLH <br />Enclosures <br />-I <br />k <br />M <br />• V <br />eE <br />h f <br />. ‘.’v 'i- ** <br />i. -VO/r' ' .is. ’c‘ <br />t V* ••* ^ <br />;• / V. ‘ “ <br />. # <br />*V. J V®' • • •* ’ * •* * <br />vSV.-^r.•..•>,.• <br />m. - •' •. <br />Vv <br />7 V' ■• ^ <br />’ :■