Laserfiche WebLink
, ihc olhcr ^i<l» had <br />tMf trial, withmil the <br />ithout k *^***‘K <br />liUK. <br />L‘ f^»r •rial c«iiir!s net <br />ilional has not l#r^-n <br />‘vt rthi lrss, it is our <br />wi and arr lirin«:inK <br />;iM*s invulviiiK ques- <br />ty fif slat*' laws l»e- <br />tm iilacftl on stale <br />of tlic iiuwcr to lic­ <br />it lonal. <br />hat wIuMi a oonstitu- <br />ri'^rntcd to the trial <br />i IS the better i#rac- <br />t<i recoijni/e its im- <br />Me thoronvihly hnef- <br />d. 1 ht* should <br />'her inijMirt.irt >sut <br />*n.e iira' t.i** as- <br />i\. lUilil tin* eor.trary <br />late iourt, IS no long- <br />kahlr. (If rourse, a <br />itiilionahty « xist ^ un- <br />h\ a eomjicti ni ♦ onrt, <br />lal Cfiurls of Wiscon- <br />ulariy enaeo *1 statute <br />nnviitniional and the <br />tatntc* tnusl nn et the <br />owin^! in;ci/nsliliilum- <br />ai'le ilouht. <br />a^ numher 1<»^», dis- <br />1*1 ;on, IS modified to <br />or\ adjiuiieation that <br />ordinanee of r»*s})oiul- <br />ity IS consiiiiitional ; <br />iTiy eonstitntes wet- <br />iiiarlv thf i»rohi:iition <br />Tisi the filling of wet- <br />il; and the judgment, <br />a I fumed. The ind>(- <br />107, tlcclariiiK a for- <br />•■•a’-- <br />y.i <br />m <br />tf <br />F?’ -; <br />.. <br />r*' 'j ■ - ' <br />r\)^ <br />LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT'J^ <br />402 Kast Lake Street ' <br />W;xy’.o?’-ta, llinnonota 53591 <br />Jarnun.y 25, 1977 <br />TOl LMCD MEMBER MUNICIPALITT CITT COUNCILS, c/o CLERKS <br />Subjeett Riparlan/^OD Riparian Access Review <br />The IMCl) is reviewing non riparian access to Lake Minnetonka in coDjnnction <br />with its study of present and. future boating density* <br />As a result of past coanaunications with the villages, the enclosed materials <br />have been developed: <br />1. "Suggested General Provision for Municipal Subdivision, <br />to Lake Minnetonka*" with legal opinion dated August y). <br />2. Subsequent modification of "Suggested General Provision.dated <br />January 22, 1977* <br />3. Supplemental oourt decisions - Nelson vs. ReLong, Bradshaw vs. <br />Duluth Imperial Mill. <br />4. Editorial on riparian ric^ts. <br />3. Legal opinion of July 13, 1974 concerning IMCD authority in re­ <br />lation to riparian ri^ts. <br />It would greatly assist the subcommittee which is studying this subject, if <br />you would review these materials in relation to your policies and regulations <br />and (l) send us a copy of any current regulations bearing on this matter, and <br />(2) make any reoommendatione you may wish to make to the subcoomittee for use <br />[|prin its consideration. <br />Sincerely <br />T.iWg IICIBTONEA CONSERVATION DISTRICT <br />!as 8. Maple, Jr. <br />Chairman <br />t 4 <br />: V; <br />rj i <br />CHAniK'j O HOWA <br />c LAV I ON L 11 r r.V <br />mi l LI MT p. I r ri.f <br />>o*,c# .1 r .p./r iLT <br />r.up 11^ A. <1/ <br />J. O t tf < I •> I » L <br />JOHN L.^f AV/Z <br />JOHN '1. tJLAN <br />JOM N V Dl C ML <br />DAVID J. KL n ViCDV <br />Mr. Fra <br />Executi <br />3300 Me <br />Wayzata <br />Dear Mi <br />Sc <br />appropi <br />ripari: <br />actual* <br />of wati <br />than '] <br />citing <br />Of pari <br />page 1* <br />Tf <br />was Hai <br />In thai <br />lamd wl <br />into 1. <br />rights <br />the poi <br />turned <br />on the <br />suit a< <br />Judgmei <br />owner • <br />on the <br />ripari* <br />(2) noi <br />rights <br />T1 <br />Supreme <br />of Wat< <br />The au <br />can in