My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1977 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
02-22-1977 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 1:33:53 PM
Creation date
1/11/2024 10:41:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
\ <br />hanges and <br />reconmenda <br />I 'i.- -J <br />■-M <br />- ■; y -k <br />> ^ <br />/V <br />Henry F. ^fc^hich and Walter R. Benson <br />A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator <br />February 3, 1977 <br />Stewart Perry - 2975 Casco Point Road <br />Seawall and Ripr^ <br />before the City to review work that was done without Council <br />“® req^red by 31.700. The last action by Council war6^4^ ^ <br />vdiOT Mr. Perry was ^vised that the retaining wall portion of the work was <br />reluctantly approved, but that the seawall must be r^ved. The erSlosS^ <br />L**"’ tagged for non-canpliance toJ-8-76. The matter was before the Nkmicipal Court on 1-18-77 for a <br />lieu^S*reSlSSJi”S/Jh'^*^^ suggested a compromise. Briefly, inUeu of removal of the treated wood seawall Mr. Perry says he will cover tiie wall <br />facing to prevent water from reaching the wood and to <br />SJ® ®^.the wall. The question before the Council is whether <br />5®^ this suggestion will be satisfactory, and to what extent the facino shouM <br />'tZ se^all). The matter is on <br />Cou.^ deSS^' " continuance depending upon the <br />PLANNING OWtllSSION MEETING - February 7, 1977 <br />Planning Comrission examined photos and saiiqile of stone he nrovided r<m>i{«4«n <br />discussed situation and considered Mr. Perry's suoee^ COrimssion <br />stone facing covering the bottom tw^Ues^ Aelf^U <br />that they would not have approved it if originally oresented <br />ttis^^y. Approval is subject to the City Engineer's recor4^&«oSs ^"effective <br />OOUJ^CIL ^CE^ING - February 14, 1977 <br />“ attendance to answer questions about <br />•1 il <br />D" ■ - <br />.1? <br />'■‘“i <br />'F- <br />1 <br />i <br />?y <br />-VV V, <br />- ■■ -■ ' « ■ , .-V,-'. <br />m <br />‘ <br />ii1 <br />II! <br />ti i <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />I).Vn-: Fc <br />Sll3,l):Cr: <br />F'r. itOuoy fi <br />April 22, 10/ <br />Me has currer <br />variances. 1 <br />Planning Coj ’.ir <br />proposals . <br />The status oj <br />as they exisi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.