Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />•’.j j>ir^^ )u '■f»1 'S..qhRV ^|||j|Hni»' -'«iflii|; <br />Victoria Grain Company <br />Subdivision (Preliminary) <br />Pape 4 <br />s f.U.^! L.r \ :- <br />r' f <br />/V <br />// <br />STAI-F - January 24, 1977 <br />Jn 1,0 ro,,oly v.ilh I'r. I.m.i’iiu's ,,loa to fu ’„,,it the r.ecessayy ixno-sio.,s to speed <br />i-.p pnxx'd.ucs. the .orrcs.-ntatlvo for "rauer 0 A-.so.,iatcs presented yo <br />addirioiial copies ol: vho p3;.n of v;hich I v;as so:,.cv.nat skept ical. I <r.A -• <br />co})V of this revised plan in the pnehet. <br />Mr. I.sihjn '.v,s soinf.diat irritated, hi)t_ni;,vcd to p.o hack to pyiyer <br />to ret so.iethiiiy toi,etlKo- thereby v.c nr;it oo nblc to c.vj.caitc the j i x. • <br />en-’ineer follov.oJ threuch and s\i’)-nitted a revised plat. Hie icvised \ l^ , , » <br />indicated soi:>3 clir.n;;cs of vdiich I was so.acpat skcpUcal. failurc to"^acknowledge <br />outlet and a dningc in the boruidaiy line of the wetlands and tho f^ili piannine <br />the Ha soil type as wetlands. I was unable to convince the <br />Co^ission and Council would possibly e^inl^rand the questionable deteimination of the wetlands bwmdaries. Mr. Nilensi^^ <br />ftom toauer t, Associates, has requested a change in the wetlan^ line. ^ to^Kon <br />of the Soil Conservation District made these Ganges m “p® TS^^e^lwed <br />he sikmitted with the revised soils map qualifies these <br />report. It does not certify this area as acceptable for on-site sewage systems.} <br />planning OCmiSSICN WiETING - February 7, 1977 <br />The following were present; Robert Cargill and <br />ssissa s.“«.ns.”Si’s: *d.» <br />within proposed Lots 4 and 5. <br />After much discussion, the Planning Lonini <br />plat subject to the following conditions: <br />(3) <br />Gmservation easement over Outlet B wetland area* <br />Combine Lots 4 and 5 as one building site imtil the problem of determining the <br />soil condition and dry buildable area can be resolved. <br />Preliminary approval does not indicate approval for any dock ri^ts. <br />Subject to a Paik Dedication Ffee. <br />If Citv deteimines that the area designated by the Hennepin Coun^ <br />Distr^t as Ha soil .this area should not be included in calculat^g dry buildablo are <br />of lots 4 and 5 individually. Each lot will lack the requir^ mini^ 2 acre area. <br />This determination was recently made by the Planning Comnission in the case of the <br />Painters Creek subdivision proposal. <br />COUNCIL - February 14, 1977 <br />Reviewed revised plan. Applicant requested lake riphts be given some co^ideratim. <br />CiioffAci-ed me cotunon dock over marsh area whidi might be designated as 3rd separate <br />Suggested some dred|in| of existing channel to <br />material resulting from erosion (maintenance of existing watttway). Concurred itt <br />n^Sg S«i« recommendation for underlying conservation «*««« ovct wtl^ <br />A but agreed to consider some change in language to prowde for future coiibination <br />< <br />4 <br />>ir'1 <br />t. <br />r !f <br />v:; 1. '■* <br />Victoria Grain ' <br />Subdivision (Pr <br />Page 5 <br />Suggested appli <br />requests. Pevi <br />tion. Revised