My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1993 Public Hearing-Flag Lot Issue Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-18-1993 Public Hearing-Flag Lot Issue Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 10:57:17 AM
Creation date
1/9/2024 10:56:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse. City Administrator <br />Michael P. GalTron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Aucust 26, 1993 <br />Update on Flag I^t Review <br />List of Exhibit <br />A - Diauram - Front/Back Lot Situations <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider flag lot issues at 7:00 p.m. <br />on Wednesday. August 18. While no specific recommendation to Council was ctiiJuded, the <br />general direction of the discussion was as follows: <br />1.There was general discussion on the background of the changes to lot widtli <br />measurement under the new Shoreland Regulations. Chairman Schroeder, who <br />was on the Lake Use Committee that reviewed the Shoreland Regulations agreed <br />that there was never a specific intent to make flag lots on the lakeshore an <br />allowed use. <br />Much of the discussion centered around the fact that whether the City allows flag <br />lots , front and hack lots with an outlot access, or front and back lots with merely <br />an access easement over the front lot , the impact on the neighboring properties <br />is the same. The rationale behind use of an access outlot versus use of a flag lot <br />was discussed, in terms of our past code definitions and requirements. It was <br />noted that under the current code, the "flag pole" portion of a flag lot is <br />creditable lot area, where an outlot or an access ea.sement are not creditable. It <br />was also noted that typical model ordinance definitions of flag lot specifically <br />disallow crediting the flag pole portion towards required lot area. <br />Planning Commission discu.ssed at some length the .specific impacts of front/back <br />lot development in general. These include: <br />a. <br />b. <br />Back lot ’s driveway abuts front lot ’s side and back yards. This leads to <br />concerns about noise, headlights, dust, child safety, and other potential <br />negative impacts. <br />.Some of these negative impacts might be minimized by requiring greater <br />lot area for the rear lot, requiring greater setbacks for the rear lot, and <br />requiring greater than normal .screening and buffering.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.