My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1993 Joint Council & Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-18-1993 Joint Council & Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 10:16:51 AM
Creation date
1/9/2024 10:16:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Joint Council and Planning Commission Work Session <br />August 18, 1993 <br />does not encroach onto the residential area and drive property values down, llexibility should <br />be given to operators to change as the market changes. <br />Hurr questioned how the adequacy of parking could be considered without looking at the <br />magnitude of the business and the potential number of boats that could go in the water. Callahan <br />noted that the major goal in parking is to avoid parking on the street and it may be true that <br />reference to numbers of boats may be the only was to come up with a formula for adequate <br />parking. However, he would like to sec some kind of plan developed which avoids counting <br />boats, i.e. a site plan with envelope for parking agreed upon by both parties. <br />Goetten stated there was a lot of confrontation between the City and Orono marinas in <br />the early 1980 ’s. From discussions last year, it was determined that there should be realistic <br />expectations on both sides so they can work together, since the marinas will continue to operate <br />in the City. She a^ked if the Planning Commission agrees with these ideas and what kind of <br />changes the Planning Commission might want to see or not see, if any. <br />Callahan agreed that hardcover and other issues should be looked at in relation to reality. <br />Ht; is unaware of any reports of "bad" parking problems so whatever is being done seems to be <br />working. <br />I lurr stated she has a problem accepting things as they are since other areas cannot do <br />anything in the 0-75 ’ zone. The City should try to achieve some improvements environmentally <br />on the sites rather than accept the status quo. Because the City has such strict standards, she <br />feels some improvements were gained in the prelimii;ary DNR plan for Gayle’s Marina and the <br />adjacent properties. <br />Jabbour added that a 0 ’ lake setback is not what he wants either but a 75’ setback is <br />unrealistic for mo.st of the marinas. Vertical density should also be addressed as the Planning <br />Commission discusses the marinas. Cruise boats (charter boats) are looking for alternative <br />homes and Orono should be ready to respond to parking issues for them. Studies have shown <br />that only 20% of the boats are on the lake at one time but boat clubs have back-to-back usage, <br />probably 50-100%. He feels the marina operator should be able to "i-ick and choose" how he <br />wants to use his space. <br />Hurr suggested the Planning Commission members involve the marina owners in their <br />discussions to get their input. She Is most concerned about environmental i.ssues such ar runoff <br />into the lake. <br />Jabbour noted that rules and regulations help to keep pricing fair and equitable when <br />marinas are on the market for sale. It helps the owner, buyer and City.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.