Laserfiche WebLink
Joint Council and Planning Commission Work Session <br />August 18, 1993 <br />does not encroach onto the residential area and drive property values down, llexibility should <br />be given to operators to change as the market changes. <br />Hurr questioned how the adequacy of parking could be considered without looking at the <br />magnitude of the business and the potential number of boats that could go in the water. Callahan <br />noted that the major goal in parking is to avoid parking on the street and it may be true that <br />reference to numbers of boats may be the only was to come up with a formula for adequate <br />parking. However, he would like to sec some kind of plan developed which avoids counting <br />boats, i.e. a site plan with envelope for parking agreed upon by both parties. <br />Goetten stated there was a lot of confrontation between the City and Orono marinas in <br />the early 1980 ’s. From discussions last year, it was determined that there should be realistic <br />expectations on both sides so they can work together, since the marinas will continue to operate <br />in the City. She a^ked if the Planning Commission agrees with these ideas and what kind of <br />changes the Planning Commission might want to see or not see, if any. <br />Callahan agreed that hardcover and other issues should be looked at in relation to reality. <br />Ht; is unaware of any reports of "bad" parking problems so whatever is being done seems to be <br />working. <br />I lurr stated she has a problem accepting things as they are since other areas cannot do <br />anything in the 0-75 ’ zone. The City should try to achieve some improvements environmentally <br />on the sites rather than accept the status quo. Because the City has such strict standards, she <br />feels some improvements were gained in the prelimii;ary DNR plan for Gayle’s Marina and the <br />adjacent properties. <br />Jabbour added that a 0 ’ lake setback is not what he wants either but a 75’ setback is <br />unrealistic for mo.st of the marinas. Vertical density should also be addressed as the Planning <br />Commission discusses the marinas. Cruise boats (charter boats) are looking for alternative <br />homes and Orono should be ready to respond to parking issues for them. Studies have shown <br />that only 20% of the boats are on the lake at one time but boat clubs have back-to-back usage, <br />probably 50-100%. He feels the marina operator should be able to "i-ick and choose" how he <br />wants to use his space. <br />Hurr suggested the Planning Commission members involve the marina owners in their <br />discussions to get their input. She Is most concerned about environmental i.ssues such ar runoff <br />into the lake. <br />Jabbour noted that rules and regulations help to keep pricing fair and equitable when <br />marinas are on the market for sale. It helps the owner, buyer and City.