My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
08-09-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 9:59:42 AM
Creation date
1/9/2024 9:56:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE; <br />SUBJECT: <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator V-c <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />August 6 1993 <br />Time Frame for Septic Upgrades when a Building Pemiit is Requested <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - DNR Letter 8/5/93 <br />Issue <br />In light of the recent allowance of a 2-year period for compliance, should building <br />permits be withheld until commencement (or completion) of required septic upgrades, when the <br />system ’s nonconformity is solely based on the lack of 3’ separation? What are the options? <br />Staff Viewpoint <br />Withholding a remodeling, addition, or accessory building permit until the septic upgrade <br />is complete (or at least underway concurrently) is a useful "lever" to ensure not only that the <br />property owners ’ resources are channeled to the septic system repairs, but also to ensure that <br />the property improvements do not have a negative impact on the existing system or future ability <br />to upgrade. Therefore, we would prefer that systems identified as needing upgrade be repaired <br />concurrently with improvement projects in most situations. <br />As a minimum, site evaluation should be complete before a permit is issued, and repairs <br />occur within a reasonable lime frame, generally before the building project is finished or shortly <br />thereafter. We would develop an agreement to this effect, for signature by the owner in order <br />to be issued the building permit. <br />Discussion <br />In a situation encountered last week for a property in Webber Hills, the property owner <br />wished to add a third stall to his two car garage. The request for a permit triggered a septic <br />conformity inspection, since the property was within the Shoreland District. Inspection <br />determined that the existing trench drainfleld has less than 3’ separation and needs to be <br />replaced. <br />The owner generally accepted the replacement requirement, but was reluctant to accept <br />the idea that he would not be allowed to do the garage addition without concurrently making <br />progress towards septic repairs (i.e., hiring a site evaluator to do testing and design, getting a <br />septic contractor lined up for the installation, etc.). Staffs intent would be to work with the <br />homeowner in accomplishing the projects concurrently, not necessarily deferring the a ition
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.