My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
08-09-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 9:59:42 AM
Creation date
1/9/2024 9:56:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Local government planning <br />As a part of the WMO planning process described under Minnesota Statutes, section 103B.201, each <br />local government will be required to prepare a local water management plan, capital improvement <br />program and official controls necessary to implement the watershed plan. As part of the local water <br />management plan, the local government will need to define water quantity and quality protection <br />methods adequate to meet performance standards established in the watershed plan. Local <br />governments will also be required to amend their local comprehensive plans to reflect the contents <br />of the watershed plan. Local governments will have two years to amend their comprehensive plans <br />from the time the WMO planning process is complete. Under rules currently proposed by the Board <br />of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), WMOs have until 1995 to complete their plans. The earliest <br />local governments are required to revise their comprehensive plans is 1997. It could take several <br />years beyond 1*>97 to implement local government plans. <br />The second piece of legislation is Minnesota Statutes, section 473.157, that requires the Metropolitan <br />Cbuncil to prepare a water resources plan that includes management objectives and target pollution <br />loads for watersheds in the metropolitan area. From this plan WMOs will advise local governments <br />of their target pollution loads. Local governments will revise their stormwater management plans to <br />include implementation steps that assure the target pollution loads are met <br />The Metropolitan Council has set as a priority developing the target pollution loads for watersheds <br />tributary to the Minnesota River. This is a priority because of the urgency to meet the EPA/MPCA <br />reduction goal of 40 percent by 1996. Target pollution loads for Bevens, Carver, Chaska and Sand <br />Creek watersheds will be developed by 1992. Pollution loads for other watersheds in the Minnesota <br />River Basin will be developed by rn:a-1993. The Council will also be actively pursuing the <br />development of target pollution loads for all watersheds in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. <br />The Minne^ta Pollution Control Agency <br />In accordance with the Clean Water Act, Section 319, the MPCA is charged with developing a state* <br />Wide strategy for addressing nonpoint pollution. This plan is a four year plan developed in 1990 and <br />is periodically updated as new information becomes available. This strategy both targets and <br />prioritizes problem areas and develops a management plan for addressing these problem areas. The <br />management plan looks at both a voluntary and a regulatory approach to addressing problems. The <br />state plan is also required to develop various approaches to funding problem solutioru from federal <br />state and local sources. <br />The Board of Water and Soil Resources <br />The Board of Water and Soil Resources is the primary state agency responsible for surface water <br />plaiming and is the lead agency responsible for carrying out many of the administrative aspects of the <br />recently passed Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, better known as the "no-net loss" legislation. The <br />act provides landowners with three options for preserving or enhancing wetlands: the wetland <br />preservation areas option; the permanent wetland preserves option; and the wetland establishment <br />and restoration program. If a land use practice requires the taking of a protected wetland the <br />legislation requires a 1:1 and a 2:1 mitigation of wetlands in rural and urban areas respectively.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.