My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
08-09-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 9:59:42 AM
Creation date
1/9/2024 9:56:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />*>4. <br />Plaining Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, Ciiv Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />July 14, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: ^1842 Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road - Variances - <br />Public Hearing <br />The application involves multiple variances for additions to the existing principal structure <br />and the installation of an accessory structure on the recently classified lakeshore property. For <br />years the applicants had proposed improvements maintaining a 26’ setback from the wetland <br />located within the east portion of his property. Review Exhibit F, applicants ’ hardcover facts <br />have been prepared based on the setback from the Long Lake protected tributary' at the cast <br />boundary of lot. Unfortunately, per the shoreland ordinance, Tanager Lake at the 929.4 <br />elevation is now located at what was originally determined to be the edge of the wetland. Staff <br />has had to readjust the hardcover facts based on the 75’ setback line described in E.xhibit G. <br />Two-thirds of the dry bnildable envelope are now located within the 0-75’ setback area where <br />no improvements are allowed. Structures that normally met the 26’ setback are now <br />nonconforming located within the 100’ setback required for structures from shoreline of <br />Recreation:'.! Development lake. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: <br />Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C-1) - Setbacks for Recreational Development lakes. The <br />following improvements require setback variances: <br />A. <br />B. <br />Upper level deck to be enclosed as part of principal structure. <br />Allowed = 100’ <br />Existing - 56’ <br />Proposed = 56’ <br />Variance = 44’ or 44% <br />Screen porch addition located over an existing deck (review Exhibits G <br />and I). <br />Allowed = 100’ <br />Existing = 48’ <br />Proposed = 43’ <br />Variance = 57’ or 57% <br />C.New deck structure. <br />Allowed = 100’ <br />Existing = 55 ’ <br />Proposed = 55 ’ <br />Variance — 45 ’ or 45 %-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.