My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
07-26-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2024 1:02:53 PM
Creation date
1/8/2024 1:00:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 28, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE *1825 - CONT. <br />Gronberg asked If they would consider the application if the <br />developer upgraded the road. <br />McCarthy requested the application be tabled for 30 days. <br />% <br />Hurr withdrew her .Tiot i on, 'and Goetten withdrew her second. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to continue Application <br /><1825 for Thomas L. McCarthy, 2-190 Old Beach Road, to the July 26, <br />1993 meeting to allow the applicant time to revise his proposal. <br />Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(*#6) tf1826 ROBERT 4 ANN HENSON, <br />2166 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3295 <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Ma.vor Cal lahan, to adopt <br />Resolution <3295 for Application #1325 for Robert and Ann Henson. <br />2166 Shaoywood Road, approving variance for the construction of an <br />attached garage and lakeside deck. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#7) #1831 EDWARD ENGLER, <br />3450 BIRCH LANE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3296 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Engler were present. <br />Mabusth explained the applicants propose the addition of a 10x20’ <br />lakeside addition to be placed over an existing patio, with the <br />remainder of patio to be removed, and a 16x24’ addition to the east <br />side of the residence. Fourteen percent of the excessive hardcover <br />in the 75-250’ zone is due to the asphalt drive which is used as <br />a turnaround for Birch Lane and used by the City for snow storage. <br />The Planning Commission requested an easement over the aspnalt <br />area, but the applicants did not wish to encumber the property with <br />an easement. A condition of the approval resolution is that the <br />City be allowed continued usage of this area, and the applicants <br />have agreed to such. <br />Staunton noted the condition of the resolution will not be binding <br />to future owners. <br />Hurr felt if this is being considered as a hardship for the <br />granting of the variance, then they should require the easement. <br />Goetten objected as they have never required an easement in the <br />past.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.