My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
07-26-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2024 1:02:53 PM
Creation date
1/8/2024 1:00:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />KENNETH FIGGE, 2004 SUGARWOOD DR - CONT. <br />It was moved bv Berg, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend aobroval <br />of the request from Kenneth Figge, 2004 Sugarwood Drive, to allow <br />filling in the rear yard, subject to a conditional use permit <br />aoplied for within 60 days from approval for a comprehensive <br />solution to the problem. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Smith, to recommend denial <br />of the request from Kenneth Figge, 2004 Sugarwood Drive, of the <br />installation of a sidewalk to the front door from the street. Ayes <br />4, nays 2. Nolan and Peterson voted nay. <br />Rowlette stated she would be willing to approve the sidewalk if it <br />were presented in a more natural fashion and toned down. Al I <br />agreed. <br />Mabusth stated she is not convinced that <br />Department would approve the portion of the <br />within the right-of-way. <br />No Ian asked the builder if he would be willing <br />half circle portion of the walk. <br />the Pub Iic Works <br />structure located <br />to eliminate the <br />Kramer stated if that is the only way to gain approval, he would <br />agree. He said he did not design the walkway but was told it fits <br />with the look of the improvements on the property. <br />It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval <br />of the request from Kenneth Figge, 2004 Sugarwood Drive, to instalI <br />a sidewalk from the street to the front aoor of the residence in <br />a straignt configuration, based on the clear opening through the <br />front yard, the existing grade is suitable to the installation, and <br />excessive grading wi I I not be necessary, and the access drive is <br />12’ opposed to the allowable 20’. <br />Lindquist suggested in the future sidewalks be on the original <br />plans to be approved with the building permit. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />(i14) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />Nolan reported on Counci I action on items presented to them at <br />their last meeting. <br />(#15) OTHER ISSUES <br />None
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.