My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
07-26-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2024 1:02:53 PM
Creation date
1/8/2024 1:00:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21 , 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1821 - CONT. <br />It was moved by Lindauist, seconded by Chair Schroeder, to <br />recommend approval of Application for Margo and Steve <br />Wirtjes, 3085 Watertown Road, aporoving a preliminary subdivision, <br />subject to the staff’s recommended conditions, and with the added <br />requirements that the road be located to the west of the outlot, <br />and the well be moved prior to final subdivision approval. Ayes 5, <br />nays 1. Smith abstained. Powlette voted nay because she felt it was <br />an extra expense to maise tne applicants move tt.e well prior to tne <br />alternate site being needed. Motion carried. <br />(#2) #1830 RICHARD F. OORLOG, <br />1058 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:25 - 7:45 P.M. <br />The Affidavit cf Publicatpn and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. Oorlog was present. <br />Mabusth commented on the accuracy of tne applicant s survey. She <br />explained the applicant proposed the removal of an upper deck to <br />be replaced wirh a enclosed dining area and upper deck, and the <br />replacement of the lower deck. The property has 92.9^ existing <br />hardcover, proposed 51.4*, which is a reduction of 1.965 s.f. <br />Chair Schroeder asked for hardsnips to be presented. <br />Oorlog replied they have a small kitchen and dining area. Also they <br />are hoping for some privacy from the adjacent neighbor, as <br />expansion of the neighbors’ deck recently does not allow for such. <br />Smith asked if a natural walkway to the lake could serve as well <br />as the steps proposed. <br />Oorlog agreed to that proposal. <br />Mabusth noted the ar-plicant proposes the removal of the plastic <br />a»-.d gravel to the rear and side of the house. She pointed out the <br />hardcover calculations were done by staff and not presented by the <br />appI * cant. <br />Oorlog clarified that he only proposes the removal of the plastic <br />as this would be consistent with wnat his neighbor was required to <br />remove. <br />Rowlette pointed <br />parking, and once <br />out one of tne <br />grave I is driven <br />rear areas is used for boat <br />on. It remains hardcover.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.