My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
07-12-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2024 10:38:15 AM
Creation date
1/8/2024 10:34:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JULY 12, 1993 <br />RASMUSSEN REQUEST - CONT. <br />Goetten stated it has been suggested that Council allow up to one <br />year to bring a non-conforming system into conformance, and asked <br />if the current owner knew the buyers’ intentions. <br />Applicant’s realtor stated obviously tne new owners are not very <br />happy about this future expense. He noted the time table has <br />created a major harcsnip to the present and future owners. <br />Hurr asked if the mortgage holder <br />conf o»'mi ng. <br />IS reouiring the system to be <br />Applicant’s realtor stated the mortgage company is more concerned <br />that the system is functioning, which it is. The buyer has <br />indicated he would possibly like to construct a deck and has <br />reviewed with the City the requirements. <br />Jabbour said the City currently does not have a policy on when all <br />systems will be required to conform, but they do have a policy on <br />how often to inspect and beginning this year alI systems will be <br />inspected for separation. He oid not anticipate a change in the <br />septic system requirements. He said he would not have a problem <br />with allowing a two year time period to make the system conforming. <br />Mayor Callahan suggested they not take any action that evening. He <br />stated they all- feel the system wi*l I need to be upgraded to be <br />conforming, but the real estate agent has suggested an extension <br />to the time period for which the system must conform would be <br />helpful. <br />Hurr felt the owners should be given a one year time period from <br />the date the entire neighborhood is inspected, the same as anyone <br />else would be allowed. <br />Jabbour felt a two year time period would be fair, or <br />buyer improves the property, or the City adopts a new <br />enforcement. Goetten agreed. <br />untiI the <br />poI icy on <br />Mabusth stated the City currently does have <br />established of one year. <br />a time period <br />Johnson noted mottling is not a true indicator of separation, and <br />he felt the City will be faced with many similar judgement calls. <br />He stated Ine system was highly inspected during installation and <br />is functioning.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.