Laserfiche WebLink
13. The City Council finds that the property cannot be put to a reasonable use unless <br />the variance is granted, and that use of the property as additional yard is not a <br />reasonable use given applicant’s reliance when he purchased the property that it <br />constituted a buildable lot as evidenced by three prior variance approvals. The <br />City Council finds that the applicant’s situation is due to unique circumstances not <br />created by the landowner, and that applicant’s purchase of the propem while <br />applicant owned the adjacent developed lot does not place applicant in the position <br />of being required to adhere to a higher standard of review as compared to an <br />owner of the property who does not own adjacent developed land. Further, the <br />Council finds that there are other similar sized lots in the locality that have been <br />developed, that development of the property will be required to adhere to the <br />same setback standards that apply to other properties in the area, and that <br />construction of a single family residence on the property will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. <br />14. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />ser\'e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />15. On June 28, 1993 the City Council on a vote of 3 ayes and 2 nays granted <br />conceptual approval for the variance request and directed staff to draft a <br />resolution of approval. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances <br />to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a new <br />residence on a property 16,748 square feet in area or 77% of the required 21,780 square feet <br />(1/2 acre) and with a lot width of 55 feet or 55% of the required 100 feet of lot width, subject <br />to the following conditions; <br />1. The detached garage located within the right-of-way of Casco Circle is a non- <br />conforming structure and subject to all pertinent municipal ordinances for non- <br />conforming structures. <br />Page 4 of 6