My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
07-12-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2024 10:38:15 AM
Creation date
1/8/2024 10:34:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File/Jfl837 <br />June 17, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />6-7’ high solid privacy fence along the rear of the property. Along the east side there is open <br />grassed yard. The retaining wall along the lot line seems to be in a serious state of disrepair. <br />Applicant should advise as to die status of the structure. Is it to remain or is to be rebuilt? <br />The 24 ’ wide garage will require a 10 ’ wide cut into the existing 4’ bank. Applicant <br />must provide grading and drainage detail with building permit. The maximum 12 ’/^' high <br />structure will be placed into the hill and may have limited visual impact on the property to the <br />north. Staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified of the improvement. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. There is an accessory storage shed on blocks located on the higher elevations to <br />the rear of the property. There is no record of this structure on the sur^e\ nor <br />does the hardcover inventory include the area. The structure must be removed <br />before r. building permit is issued for the new detached garage. <br />2. What other hardcover improvements can be removed to offset increase of 5.4% <br />hardcover - 239.2 s.f. or 3.1% of patio deck. 158.72 s.f. or 2.1% of pavement, <br />others? <br />3. The accessory structure will be placed Ic.*;' than 5 ’ from the lot line and will <br />require special firewall construction based on building code requirements. <br />4. There is no turnaround on the site. Based on the limited use of roadway a>«d <br />location of property near the end of cul-de-sac, staff would recommend against <br />a turnaround on the property. The lot is already severely impacted by existing <br />hardover improvements. <br />5. Will there will b; a visual impact for the property owners to the north and east <br />and if so, how would you minimize impact? <br />Any recommendation of approval must include the following: <br />1. Removal of storage shed on blocks in rear yard prior to the City issuing a <br />building permit for new construction. <br />2. Detailed foundation/grading plans for foundation walls of garage. <br />3.Hardcover removals are to be required. These removals must be completed pnor <br />to the footing inspection for the detached garage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.