07-12-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 8, 1993 COUNCIL i/i UL! 1 7 CnY OF ORONO SUBJECT: /)fl837 Cindy Fredrickson. 1516 Long Lake Blvd. • Variances - Resolution Additional Exhibits J • Existing Hardcover - Amended from Original K - Proposed Hardcover - Amended ^rom Original L • Existing Site Plan M • Proposed Site Plan Brief Description of Request Applicant proposes construction of a 24’x32’ detached garage and the removal of the existing garage. The existing garage structure is located IW from the east lot line and 3* from the north line. The proposed structure will be 2’ from the east lot line and 6* from the rear lot line at me northeast comer of structure. With the relocation of the detached garage further south on the property, proposed garage will no longer meet the required 10’ separation from the principal structure. Applicant proposes a 6 ’ separation. The garage at 768 s.f. must meet a 15’ setback from all lot lines. Proposed improvement will result in an increase of 4.2% strucmral coverage (15.7% exists). During the Planning Commission review, it was noted that applicant’s original hardcover proposed showed an increase of 5.4%. Applicant agreed to remove certain hardcover improvements and has filed an amended hardcover proposal. Review Exhibits J, K, L and M. Hardcover inventory is now recorded as follows: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - 250-500’ setback area = 8,580 s.f. Allowed * 2,574 s.f. or 30% Existing * 4.164.9 s.f. or 48.5% (staff amended to include area of 12’xl4’ shed) Amended proposal = 3,894.52 s.f. or 45.39% The 12’xl4’ unfinished shed shall be removed upon completion of new stiuctu :. Applicant also advises that the retaining wall along the east lot line will be replaced within a year. Staff has been contacted by Troy Anderson, the neighbor to the east, and he has advised that he would be willing to provide a written statement to City allowing applicant to install tie backs for future retaining wall. The applicant has submitted acknowledgment forms from all adjacent neighboring property owners. The City has received no negative comments from any of the neighbors notified for this review.