Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />December 11, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Agenda and the Consent Agenda as submitted. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br />19.LA23-000045, ELLETTE ANDERSON, VACATION OF ROW BETWEEN 1250 AND <br />1260 SPRUCE PLACE <br />City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is requesting to vacate the <br />unimproved right-of-way situated between 1250 Spruce Place (owned by James and Melissa Easley) and <br />1260 Spruce Place (owned by Ms. Anderson, the applicant). There are no City utilities within the right-of- <br />way; however, there are riprap spillways facilitating overland drainage from Spruce Place, retaining walls <br />and approximately 900 square feet of the Easley’s driveway. The Planning Commission recommended <br />approving the vacation on condition of maintaining a drainage easement over the strip. Positive public <br />comments were received. The City Engineer does not recommend vacating the right of way as the site <br />serves as a drainage way for the area and it has also been identified as a possible future public accessway <br />to the lake. The access has a public purpose because of the drainage way, Curtis said. There are identified <br />lake access points in this area including Sandy Beach located to the south, which is established as a <br />swimming beach, and the City’s fishing dock off of Loma Linda Avenue to the north. Both access points <br />are less than 500 feet from this location. Curtis explained the challenge with vacating rights-of-way is <br />that vacation is final. Should the public or the City have access or utility needs in the future, the cost to <br />taxpayers to reacquire the property will be at a premium, she said, so vacation reduces options for the City <br />in the future. Staff recommends denial of the request to vacate the right-of-way at this time as there is <br />currently a public benefit for drainage purposes and the future purpose of the land is undetermined. <br />Ellette Anderson said her family has maintained this property for more than 50 years including managing <br />the drainage in the easement and into their basement. Her mother had a letter from the City in 1979 <br />stating that this property had no use for a public purpose. Also, there are three lake accesses within 500 <br />feet. The one three houses down from her home is heavily used, she said. The vacation would allow the <br />Easleys to pave their driveway and have a safer access. They have the only unpaved driveway in the <br />neighborhood. When her family bought the home the easement was a muddy mess full of garbage and the <br />residents cleaned it up and took care of it. She said they are happy for the City to have an easement there <br />to take care of drainage. <br />Mayor Walsh stated it is the habit of the DNR to say no but the City has been trying to clean these up and <br />do what makes common sense. He noted the strip no longer serves as a fire lane and said he would be in <br />favor of granting the vacation and maintaining a drainage easement. <br />Benson asked about the issue of erosion and gravel from the driveway going toward the lake. <br />Easley said they had not approached the City about that problem previously. He does not see how people <br />can get down to the water there. <br />Edwards said even if this strip was vacated, because of the drainage easement, there would still need to be <br />encroachment agreements for the driveway and any retaining walls. <br />5