Laserfiche WebLink
jjH_0-C-'r3 rV. 17:33 ID: It£=S:Ni TEL SD:El2 ="1-773-:=123 Fes <br />nr. Kavin Staunton <br />Xg, Karan Cola <br />Juna A, 1993 <br />Paga 4 <br />^ -1^ thev wish to sell their property, allspecieioaliy told would have to be sold as a <br />three 4 _ this property involved an on-sito septic <br />Bingl. have erl.ted a problen with the <br />system! The constructed In residential areas. Thaindividual egtio *ys«^ seasonal^ln <br />re2r.nor3i2e'~t^Sa;.'2„"Sl2.-.tiv. r.-eonahie uae. U.e aa a <br />vacant lot is not a reasonable use/ <br />threehoid SSfai*alternative "raasMabla US . Minneeota Courts <br />determined use requirement does not mean thathave held that the reaeonab^ uoe^re^ ^ ^ <br />a property v. Board ad4ustnant^ 446 H.W.2d <br />»PP. -Sn]’. ^sJS!iOE2!ffl^ *■»«« <br />(Minn. 1969). <br />If the City f TrL^SablS Sfe?”then <br />VS^T^ll "“^..on toVnt any^rijnee.^ K,Sl«.t <br />property i!/““w"nSv2r“S 2n? S2S f^‘S v«rlMc. elne. <br />Ii“y» ho V”; „5SS’'S; <br />“?din«« Sth«"than*eiBply ee a vacant piece a, preperty. <br />in oay, an individuel o^cd jll »* "^^.^P-rcei^^^po^r ’ ‘ <br />He Snveyed off J”® a sSSnd purchaser. Ultimately <br />the other half of tte parcels and owned tts <br />the Youngs became tte the Youngs sought to rstransfsr the <br />entire Property, Jo JhS curSs. Se Currys then soughtone pereel of the Property to ^ Currys. ^ ^ ^inglm family <br />a variance for a Court in eurrr held that <br />nouse on this re-acguirsd both parcels of ths <br />the mere fact that the ^ y^^nite the two eo as toproperty after severance d^ not Mun^e <br />"SStitite « -ingle lot. ‘=“;^i“ne"a?eel a denial of the <br />of the peculiar site and reasonaole use of their <br />variance would deprive curr^ SfiJ thec^eviir. though the granting <br />Koporty. in fact, the ot'ier adjoining property <br />It tha varianca would work a ^rdaWf uee of the <br />ownara, the variance must be 9^»'''"^,„:2|;ibie’ue." of tne <br />property as a vacant lot wae not. <br />A.