My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-28-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2024 11:25:34 AM
Creation date
1/5/2024 11:20:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
482
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 28, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1825 - CONT. <br />Dan Sadlack, 2409 Old Beach Road, stated during the Planning <br />Commission a petition of opposition was presented expressing <br />concerns for environment, aethestic, and safety on the single lane. <br />Mayor Callahan noted the objections raised at the Planning <br />Commission were valid, but added if the applicant meets all the <br />rules and regulations of the City, they are required to approve the <br />appI ica tion. <br />Hurr felt there should only be one curb cut allowed for the <br />property and should be on an outlot. <br />Kathleen Ronald, 2480 Old Beach Road, stated they purchased their <br />property because it was a two acre parcel with privacy. Because of <br />the elevation of the McCarthy property and the addition of a new <br />residence, that privacy will be lost. <br />Paul Anderson, 2530 Old Beach Road, asked the required cul-de-sac <br />radius. <br />Mabusth indicated a cul-de-sac is required to have a 100’ platted <br />right-of-way diameter and 80’ paved width. The turnaround currently <br />located at the end of the street does not meet the standards, but <br />the right-of-way is available. <br />Staunton stated the code indicates it is the obligation of the <br />developer to bring the road up to standard. <br />Jabbour reminded the public that the applicant is not requesting <br />any variances with the most recent proposal. <br />David Schneider, 2540 Old Beach Road, expressed opposition to the <br />propose I. <br />Jabbour noted If the aoplication meets all standards, regardless <br />of the affect it will have on aesthetics, they must aoprove. <br />Hurr indicated the City Engineer suggested only one curb cut for <br />the property because of safety reasons, and she felt they should <br />listen to his recommendation. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded oy Goetten, to deny Application <br />#1825 for Thomas L. McCarthy, 2490 Old Beach Road, for a <br />preliminary subdivision because they felt there should only be one <br />curb cut for the property whict. does not leave enough acreage to <br />subdivide, based upon the City Engineer’s recommendation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.