My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
06-28-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2024 11:25:34 AM
Creation date
1/5/2024 11:20:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
482
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LINDQUIST & VENNUM <br />4200 IDS Center <br />80 ScxfTx Eio»^ S^^«rr <br />IAmscapous MMC90TA 55402 2T05 <br />Tel£pmc»^ 612-371 >3211 <br />Fax 612>371>3207 <br />fyN Dcnve >« <br />LMOJIST VCMitti & OWTTHSfW <br />800 1 Trx Swrr S^rr 2125 <br />DtNvta Colorado 8(SSXJ 5401 <br />TELFPHONf 303-573-5000 <br />Attorneys At <br />ROBERT G. MITCHELL, JR. <br />612-371-3262 <br />\ <br />June 16, 1993 <br />'JUN '1 e 1C‘S3 <br />Ms. Jean Mabusth <br />Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />2750 Kelly Parkway <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Re: Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth J. Figge, 2004 Sugarwoods Drive <br />Lot 2, Block 1, Sugarwoods <br />Dear Jean: <br />On June 2, 1993 you and Paul Vang met with Larry Kramer, his <br />employee Wayne and myself concerning three issues about the Figge <br />residence in Sugarwoods. This letter will constitute the Figge's <br />application to Orono for permission for two items with regard to <br />their new house. The three items relate to a sidewalk from the <br />front door to Sugarwoods Drive, the driveway itself from the <br />garage area to Sugarwoods Drive and a drainage area immediately <br />north of the patio at the rear of the house. We understand this <br />matter will be heard by the planning commission at its meeting on <br />June 21, 1993. <br />Driveway issue. Orono's position on the driveway through <br />the 50-foot building setback area to the street is that the paved <br />surface of the driveway must be perfectly straight. The Figge's <br />propose that the preferred and reasonable interpretation of the <br />rule is that the 12 foot wide paved driveway surface may curve <br />within the 20-foot wide permitted zone for a driveway, but that <br />the 20-foot driveway zone itself must be straight from the street <br />through the 50-foot restricted zone. <br />Alternatively, if a variance is needed, the Figge's believe <br />the driveway will be more aesthetically pleasing both to their <br />house, to the development and to the public if 12 foot surface <br />can be curved. The slight cuir/e will enable them to better <br />landscape their property to insure privacy for their property and <br />to add additional landscaping to the Sugarwoods. It also aids in <br />preservation of existing trees. <br />Sidewalk issue. While originally the declaration permitted <br />curved, half-moon driveways with two curb cuts, Orono Resolution <br />No. 2652 reduced the number of curb cuts to one curb cut and one
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.