06-28-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zonine File ^2004 June 17. 1993 Pace 2 The second request involves installation of a paved walkway located within the 50 ’ front/street protected area. The conditional use permit that granted approval of the planned residential development and the covenants specifically state that the only hardcover improvement allowed within the front street protected area shall be a driveway at a maximum width ot 20’. The whole intent of the P.R.D. application was to minimize removal of trees. This would be the first request for the installation of a walkway within the front yard protected area. The builder, Mr. Kramer, has advised that no trees were removed as a result of the installation of the walkway as the walkway follows the line of the utility installation trom Sugarwood Drive. The third request involves the need to till a low retention area to the north ot the existing residence, review Exhibit F. The area is located within the 50 ’ rear protected area. The standing water has already killed off several of the trees located within the area. Applicant wishes to provide positive drainage from the residence and connect with existing natural drainageway that drains from west to east. The low area will receive approximately 20 cubic vards of fill from the construction excavations on site. Applicant ’s consultants have advised that there are major problems developing with drainage for both the residence at 2002 and 2004 Sugarw ’oods and will file a conditional use permir application for the July meeting that will involve a more comprehensive review and improvement plan. New members should be advised that it is the responsibility of the applicant to present their position seeking to var>' from the covenants. Review Exhibit H, the packet of supportive information submitted for members review and action. There is no chwge by the City for these reviews. In the review of these requests the Planning Commission will have the final say. It will only be brought m the Council if applicant wishes to appeal a recommendation and final action of the Planniiu Commission. If the Planning Commission denies a request, the applicant may proceed with an appeal to the Council at the very next Council meeting on June 28th. ch