Laserfiche WebLink
This requirement is needed to ensure that none nforming <br />systems are upgraded by the property owners, at the time of <br />permitted expansion, remodeling or new building. This will <br />have long term positive impacts towards the protection, <br />improvement and preservation of shoreland area natural <br />resources, specifically surface waters and groundwater. <br />Finally, in conjunction with the requirements to upgrade <br />systems through funded local programs, three specific <br />program approaches are listed to provide guidance to local <br />officials in meeting the rule's intent for addressing <br />nonconforming systems. Subitems (1) and (2) are approaches <br />that are currently being successfully implemented by some <br />Minnesota counties with substantial lake acreage and <br />development activity. Subitem (3) was developed by <br />shoreland staff as an alternative approach to subitems (1) <br />and (2). Collectively, subitems (1), (2) and (3) satisfy <br />recommendations from statewide shoreland managers as found <br />in SUP 3, Issue 1, points 4 and 6. Subitem (4) is needed t <br />provide local units of government with the flexibility to <br />introduce creative and effective alternatives for meeting <br />the intent of this item. For example some Minnesota <br />counties are currently and successfully holding up the sale <br />and transfer of shoreland properties until either the buyer <br />or sellers agree to having the necessary actions done to <br />bring nonconforming sewage systems into compliance with <br />Chapter 7080 and setback requirements of this subpart. In <br />summary, all of the above approaches are needed and <br />reasonable in order to set guidelines for future local <br />programs aimed at correcting existing non-conforming sewage <br />treatment systems. <br />6120.350Q SUBDIVISION PROVISIONS <br />Subp. 1. LancK^uitability. <br />The language in <br />establishment of lo <br />created on paper but <br />structure and siting o <br />recreational facilities, <br />unsuitable lands cannot <br />filling. The proposed langu <br />issues that must be considere <br />new language requires that e <br />in its natural state, that <br />alteration, grading and <br />government should consj <br />to flooding, existen <br />topography, near-s <br />water-based recr <br />presence of s <br />rules regarding the <br />deficient <br />totally <br />sewage <br />This provis <br />ade sui <br />ling an <br />the subdi <br />of wetlands, <br />aquatic condition <br />important <br />toric site <br />s may be <br />unsuit^Jble for building <br />ment systems and <br />n is needed so that <br />ble by grading and <br />resses very important <br />en lots are created. The <br />ot created must be suitable <br />minimum vegetation <br />local units of <br />sions susceptibility <br />ness of the <br />unsuitable for <br />ildlife habitat, <br />other feature