My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-28-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2024 11:25:34 AM
Creation date
1/5/2024 11:20:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
482
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 14, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1825 - CONT. <br />Mabusth indicated by inciuding the drive in the total hardcover <br />calculation, they would limit development closer to the lake. <br />Mayor Callahan noted this is the first variance request before the <br />Council to the new shoreland regulations and suggested tabling <br />until a full Council is present. <br />It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table <br />Application #1825 for Thomas McCarthy, 2490 Old Beach Road, until <br />all members of the Council are present. Ayes 3, nays 0. <br />Gronberg asked Council for direction regarding the width of the <br />drive. <br />Mayor Callahan said he would prefer to see the application vanish, <br />but if it were to proceed would like to see the drive at a width <br />sufficient for emergency vehicles. <br />(#9) #1826 ROBERT & ANN HENSON, <br />2166 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES <br />Mr. and Mrs. Henson were present. <br />Mabusth explained the applicants propose an attached garage and <br />associated drive to the rear of the residence, an 8x25’ lakeside <br />deck (a portion of which is within the 0-75’ zone and encroaches <br />the average lakeshore setback), in exchange for the removal of the <br />tennis court, brick patio, walkway under an overhang, and a storage <br />shed area. The deck has been reduced per the Planning Commission <br />suggesting, however, the application was still denied. Since that <br />meeting, she said she has discussed the drainage issue with the <br />Planning Commission Chair explaining the catch basin leading to the <br />tile to the drainageway. Staff had hoped a storm water treatment <br />facility could be incorporated, however, the City Engineer has <br />cautioned against as there Is very little land available. The <br />County has advised there is no sediment control devise within the <br />catch basin, and staff feels this de.'ice should be incorporated <br />during the construction of the drive. The Hensons are willing to <br />dedicate a 5’ easement along the north property line. <br />Mr. Henson said he understood the sediment control would not be <br />effective, and that is why they would be willing to dedicate the <br />drainage easement in anticipation of the installation of storm <br />sewer. <br />Kelley expressed concern about the addition of another garage on <br />the property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.