Laserfiche WebLink
]) <br />Zoning File #1825 <br />June 10. 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />75-250’ setback area = 27,100 s.f. <br />Original proposal = 8,588 s.t. or 31.69% <br />Amended proposal = 6,410 s.f. or 23.65% <br />250-500’ setback area = 2,600 s.f. <br />Existing = 1,700 s.f. or 65.38% <br />Amended proposal = 1,520 s.f. or 58.46% <br />If the City was to consider hardcover based on the area between the 75’ and 500 <br />setback, hardcover would be reviewed as follows; <br />Total area = 29,700 s.f. <br />.Allowed = 7,425 s.f. or 25% <br />Proposed = 8,110 s.f. or 27.3% <br />Hardcover excess = 685 s.f. or 2.3% <br />The applicant would have to remove 685 s.f. of existing hardcover to meet the 25% <br />allowance under this format. Applicant should determine if he can maintain hardcover at the <br />allowed 7,425 s.f. or 25% or will he need the additional area of the property to support needed <br />improvements. <br />Many of the adjacent neighbors turned out to protest the proposed subdivision. They <br />were concerned over what they foresee a.s a major negative impact on their neighborhood. They <br />noted the condition and limits of the private road, Shorehills Road, and potential hazards for the <br />users of the roadway. Shorehills Road was platted in 1941 and is served from Old Beach Road. <br />It will be applicant’s responsibility to provide written conTinnation tha* legal access is provided <br />to die -^ew lot. It is doubtful that covenants for a subdivision approved in 1941 would still be <br />ir cW«i f but the City would have to ask for confirmation as a condition of final subdivision <br />approval. It would also be the applicant’s responsibility to provide documents that the fiinire <br />lot owner would be responsible for an equal share in the maintenance and upkeep of the private <br />road. <br />Tree removal was a major concern. The property is covered with mature plantings. If <br />the property is to be developed, it will require the removal of several mature trees. The City <br />has no regulations over tree removal c.<cept tor the area within the 0-75 setback area. <br />Drainage was another concern. The neighbors felt that to place a house on this portion <br />of the propertv will impact drainage in the area. The City Engineers were asked to go out and <br />inspect the aa-a to determine what impact new residential construction will have on the <br />immediate watershed. The City Engineer will be able to respond to any drainage concerns at <br />the meeting.