Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File ^1811 <br />April 15. 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners List <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Survey <br />E - Resolution #1904 <br />F - Front Elevation <br />G - Bielke Letter ^ <br />Description of Request <br />The applicant requests the renewal of lot area/lot width variances granted per Resolution <br />#1607 (2/84). #1904 (1/86). and #2123 (3/87). Each of the variances expired at the end of one <br />year before a building permit was issued. The applicant. t_. Jack Remien. currently owns the <br />subject property (Lot 18) as well as the neighboring property (Lot 19), where the applicant <br />resides. A potential buyer for this property who wishes to construct a residence would like <br />assurance that the lot is buildable. Rough plans have recently been submitted for the proposed <br />home and the potential buyer of the propeny will attend the Planning Commission meeting if <br />there are any questions. <br />A preliminary review of the proposed residence has been completed by staff. No <br />hardcover is proposed within 75’ of the lake and hardcover within the 75-250’ zone is at 24%, <br />meeting the 25% hardcover requirement. Hardcover between 250-500 ’ of the lake has 16.5% <br />hardcover. Lot coverage is at 10% and the structures appeal to meet the height requirements. <br />Therefore, no additional variance would be required. <br />This propeny. Lot 18, was originally owned in common witli the two lots to the north. <br />Lots 16 and 17. which were not combined.' As a result of the common ownership study, the <br />City changed its policy on common ownership lots in sewered zones and based on the individual <br />merits of Lot 18, the lot area and width variances were granted. <br />The neichbors. Warren and Christine Bielke. who live adjacent to the subject property <br />(Lots 16 and 17) believe the lot too small and the impact of building a residence too great and <br />ask that the variance be denied. Enclosed as Exhibit G is a letter from them explaining their <br />position. They have included a list of signatures of other neighbors who support the denial of <br />the application.