My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
12-12-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2024 11:33:42 AM
Creation date
1/4/2024 11:30:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Establishing Priorities <br />The three major items to consider <br />in developing a lot are the loca*ions of <br />the house, water supply well, and the <br />sewage treatment system. Usually ma <br />jor concerns to the owner of an unde <br />veloped lot are the location, aspect* <br />view, and type of house proposed. <br />However, additional projected improve <br />ments including a driveway, garage, <br />patio, or swimming pool may conflict <br />with the area most suited for on site <br />sewage treatment. It is important that <br />the site evaluation for the treatment <br />system be discussed at an early stage in <br />the development plans for the lot. <br />It is a rare instance where each of <br />the desired improvements can be lo <br />cated exactly where the lot purchaser <br />wants. Priorities will have to be estab <br />lished and tradeoffs are inevitable. All <br />of this should be discussed before the <br />physical investigation of the actual site <br />for the sewage treatment system. <br />After lot boundaries have been es <br />tablished. the process of selecting loca <br />tions for the various improvements <br />begins. A careful evaluation should be <br />made of topo^^aphy, land forms, vege <br />tation (including large trees the owner <br />may want to preserve, or cattails which <br />indicate a high watertable), drainage- <br />ways. recent construction activities <br />which may have disturbed or removed <br />the top soil, and any physical features <br />atfecting the site (figure 1). Notice the <br />location of agricultural drain tiles on <br />the lot. These were installed to reduce <br />the leyel of saturated zones of water <br />in the soils below the rooting depth of <br />plants. This means that under normal <br />conditions the soils have excess water <br />during wet periods which can reduce <br />c.'op growth and yields. It is important <br />to maintain the drainage provided by <br />this tile to avoid ai^.y future wetness <br />problems. For example, if a basement <br />were excavated in one of the tile lines, <br />it could mean a basement full of water <br />in the next hard rain. <br />Both the owner and site evaluator <br />should have a plan on paper which can <br />be tested against the actual lot. Since <br />it is much easier to remove lines on <br />paper than to physically move struc <br />tures, water wells, or other improve <br />ments. this is the time to determine <br />suitability of the proposed locaticn^s <br />(figure 2). Before the site evaluator <br />makes the first boring, all of the pre <br />liminary planning mentioned hero <br />should be completed. <br />Figure 1. Topography of lot using 2 foot contours to emphasize significant landscape differences. <br />Figure 2. Homeowner's original concept of where the improvements should be located on the <br />lot. Two potential treatm nt system sites are indicated. (Lot concept plan) <br />J^AD CENTERUNE <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.