Laserfiche WebLink
activity has caused compaotlon, then the ability of this soil to transmit <br />liquid will have been seriously reduced. <br />For proper hydraulic performance, there should be at least 2 feet of <br />natural or fill soil with a percolation rate between 5 and 120 minutes per <br />inch. This could be 2 feet of natural soil above a saturated layer, it <br />could be 1 foot of natural soil plus 1 foot of fill soil, or it could be 2 <br />feet of fill soil, preferably of loamy sand texture. Unless the soil under <br />the mound has the ability to transmit liquid both vertically and <br />horizontally, the mound will not function properly. <br />Another critical layer which is essential to proper mound performance is <br />the soil surface upon which the clean sand layer is placed. Soil surface <br />preparation which is described on page 9 should be carefully studied. Once <br />the clean sand layer is in place, it will be extremely difficult for the <br />inspector to determine how the soil surface was prepared prior to sand <br />placement. A soil surface which has been smeared, compacted, and otherwise <br />made unsuitable for the movement of liquid through it, will not recover <br />that capacity after a period of time. Liquid will likely seep out of the <br />mound at the toe of the dike or at the edge of the rock layer. <br />Page 9 indicates that a crawler or track-type tractor shall be used for <br />mound construction. Page 16 shows earth pressures of various sized <br />track-type tractors. It is recommended that the earth pressure of the <br />crawler tractor used for mound construction not exceed 1,000 Ibs/sq ft. <br />The use of proper construction equipment along with proper construction <br />techniques is essential to proper mound performance. <br />The other layer over which the contractor has responsibility, but which can <br />easily be checked by the inspector, is the texture of the clean sand layer. <br />Clean sand is described on page 10 on the basis of a sieve analysis. Clean <br />sand can also easily be determined by using the fruit jar test. Place <br />exactly 2 inches of sand in the bottom of a quart fruit jar and then fill <br />the jar three-fourths full of water. Place the cover on the jar and shake <br />the contents vigorously. Allow the jar to stand for about an hour and <br />observe if there is a layer of silt or clay on top of the sand. If the <br />thickness of these fine particles is more than 1/8 inch, the sand is likely <br />not suitable for use in the mound construction. The reason is that too <br />many fine particles tend to cause the soil to compact during the <br />construction process. Also, the long-term acceptance rate of this soil <br />will be slower than the long-term acceptance rate of clean sand, which is <br />used for sizing the rock layer. <br />Troubleshooting a failed raound requires a soil auger which can collect a <br />sample of the sand layer used by the contractor. The same soil auger can <br />penetrate into the soil under the clean sand layer to determine if that <br />layer is unusually compact. The soil 'uger will also allow one to <br />determine if a barrier layer such as seasonally saturated soil is closer <br />than 3 feet to the bottom of the rock layer. <br />The soil sizing factor for the clean sand layer of the mound is 0.83 square <br />feet per gallon of waste per day. Mote that this is the soil sizing factor <br />for a soil having a percolation rate in the range of 0.1 to 5 mpi, as found <br />-ii- <br />r <br />A <br />r