Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1233 <br />December 16, 1987 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />3. How does the fact that we are dealing with a new residence <br />structure on the property affect your decision? Should it have an <br />affect in your consideration? <br />4. Under what conditions would you approve alterations within the 0*> <br />75' setback area? <br />Environmental benefits. <br />Comprehensive improvement of drainage - not only on a single <br />property but also surrounding properties. <br />Severe erosion. <br />Ease of maintenance reducing hazard to homeowner. <br />Ability to eliminate structural hardcover. <br />Others <br />Staff Recommendation <br />To recommend a conditional use permit and variance per Section 10.03, <br />Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the replacement of <br />retaining walls within the lakeshore yard and reconstruction of steps not <br />to exceed 4' width standard and to deny the request of the applicant to <br />alter existing grades within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area requiring <br />1,075 cubic yards of f’ll to be removed, based on the following findings: <br />1. No appreciable environmental benefit to quality of run-off. <br />2. Limits disturbance within lakeshore protected area. <br />3. No acceptable hardship has been demonstrated by applicant as there <br />is adequate depth to move house further away from shoreline and <br />suggest to the applicant that he consider either moving the house back <br />or use the 30'+ feet of the existing width in front of proposed house <br />to provide walk-out and that the City may consider granting a <br />conditional use permit to allow fill brought to site to artifically <br />raise grades. A grading plan (proposed contours plus amount and , <br />location of fill, cross profile) must be submitted prior to formal <br />action by the Planning Commission if applicant wishes to reconsider <br />and request tabling. <br />fT-rrfefiai