My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
11-16-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2024 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 3:41:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ZONING FILE NO. 1107 <br />CITY OP ORONO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />473-7357 Date of Notice; 2/19/87 <br />William I. Lewis <br />Kathleen Trcttel <br />1501 West Fayette <br />Springfield, IL 62704 <br />COPIES TO: <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance <br />DATE OP MT4ETING; 2/17/87 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against <br />Planning Commission recommends the following: <br />Tabled: For reasons noted below <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />At 8:00 A.M. on 2/17/87, a letter si',ned by property owners <br />to the south and west of subject property was received at the <br />City offices. A copy of that letter is attached for your review. <br />The concerns expressed in that letter could not be adequately <br />addressed by City staff on such short notice. The neighboring <br />property owners appeared at the Planning Commission public <br />hearing on 2/J.7/87 and requested that the application be denied, <br />citing the reasons as stated in their letter. Planning <br />Commission felt it was unfair to take any action without the <br />applicant being present to address tl.ose unanticipated concerns. <br />The item was tabled until the applicant can be present. <br />Given the above tabling, it appears your application for a <br />simple variance renewal may not be as simple as we had originally <br />expected. I am scheduled to review your property with the City <br />Engineer on 2/24/87 to discuss the drainage concerns expressed. <br />The topographical survey you allude to in your application is <br />necessary to our further review of the application. It is likely <br />that if the lot area variance is approved, a number of conditions <br />would be attached, such as granting of a drainage easement and <br />upgrading of the drainageway at the southerly end of the lot. <br />Please call or stop in to discuss this matter. The next <br />Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for March 16.. 1987. <br />Please let me know if you or your designated representative can <br />attend that meeting. <br />If you desire certified copies of the official Planning <br />Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder <br />after review and approval by the Planning Commission. <br />j
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.