11-16-1987 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

When should the work be completed? If the Planning Commission and Council feel thac applicant should share in the costs of a private culvert upgrade project, then the other two directly benefitted ov/ners must also agree to spend money at this time.... It would seem there needs to be some agreement on all sides in order for this upgrade to happen privately. If the neighboring property owners insist that the project become a public j ject, shared by all benefitting property owners, whether their ..onefit is direct or indirect, then the attendent costs of such a project will undoubtably rise. Staff recommendation Staff would recommend approval of the lot area variance renewal finding that; A. There is no additional land available for purchase to make this a conforming parcel. D. The lot area is consistent with that of other developed lots in the neighborhood. C. The variance was previously granted in 1980. D. Sewer is available and has been assessed for a total of one unit. E. Ample area exists on the lot to develope a single family residence and a pertinent improvements without the need for further variances. Approval is subject to; 1. Setbacks of 35 fi-et from the west, south and east lot lines and 10 feet from the north lot line. 2. Payment of park fee of $390.00 at the time a building permit is issued. 3. Legal combination of all four lots into one tax parcel must be filed and accepted by Hennepin County prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Hardcover allowed (2/3 in 250-500', 1/3 in 500-1000’) may not exceed 8,360 square feet on the property. 5. Applicant shall grant a drainage easement over the westerly and southerly 10 feet of the property. 6. Improvements to the property may not ~cJ»ong-e drainage pattern in the neighborhood. Applicants shall share in the costs and shall share in the responsibility for improvements to the drainageway and culvert underneath the driveway serving the two properties to