My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
11-16-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2024 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 3:41:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r ■5 <br />i . <br />CITY of ORONO <br />Post Office liox 66«CrysU'I Bay, Minnesota f)532:i» Municipal Offices <br />«iii On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />October 14, 1987 <br />Greg Perl <br />309 Westlake Street <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Re:Re-opening of <br />addition. <br />Zoning File #1104 regarding variances for house <br />Dear Mr. Perl: <br />At your request, I have reviewed Zoning File #1104 in regards to the <br />items necessary for submittal to re-open that application. At the Planiixng <br />Commission meeting of February 17, 1987 a number of conditions were <br />recommended by staff and were adopted by Planning Commission in their <br />motion to table the application. Those seven items included: <br />1. Applicant must provide a site evaluation and design for interim <br />septic repair/upgrade to handle the proposed house. <br />2. Applicant must provide an acceptable justification or hardship <br />reason for granting the structure-to-structure setback variance, <br />revised plans to show house attached to garage; staff recommended <br />denial of the variance and recommended that applicant redesign to <br />maintain the 10' setback between the structures or attach the garage <br />to the house. <br />3. Staff recommended approval of the side setback variance given that <br />the addition is no closer to the side lot line than the existing <br />house. <br />4. Staff recommended approval of the rear setback variance given that <br />the septic system limits expansion to the front, the garage limi s <br />expansion to the right and building height limitation limits expansion <br />upward, leaving only the expansion to the rear as an option. <br />5. Staff recommended that the home occupation problems on the <br />property be addressed by the applicant and be resolved. <br />6. Applicant was directed to provide a to-scale set of plans or <br />revised plans for the City to review (existing plans filed are <br />l'' = 4.3', not a workable scale). Applicant is to provide an updated <br />survey verifying the location of the garage. <br />7. Applicant is to provide acceptable justification for the height <br />variance or redesign the structure to eliminate the need for tnat <br />variance. <br />liUlLDINC A ZONING - 473-7357 <br />ASSESSING <br />administration a fin ANCI - 473 7358 1*1111 If WORKS - 473-735‘)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.