My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
11-16-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2024 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 3:41:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 <br />#1104 GREGG PERL <br />309 WETLAKE STREET <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10:05 - 10:21 <br />The Affidavit '>f Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Mr. & Mrs. Gregg Perl were present for this matter. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />request for roar setback, structure-to-structure <br />setback, side setback variances, and height variance to <br />construct an addition to existing residence. He <br />reviewed the existing structures and the proposal. <br />Staff recommends tabling this application subject to the <br />following: <br />1. Applicant providing a site evaluation and design <br />for interim septic repair/upgrade to handle the <br />proposed house. <br />2. Applicant providing an acceptable justification <br />or hardship reason for granting the structure-to- <br />structure variance, or revise plans to show house <br />attached to garage; staff recommends denial of this <br />variance as proposed and feels applicant should re- <br />d isign to maintain the requir-d 10 ‘ setback, or <br />attach the garage. <br />3. Staff suggests that the side setback variance is <br />justifiable given the addition is no closer to the <br />line than the existing house. <br />4. Staff suggests that the rear setback Vciriance is <br />reasonable, given that the side lot lino limits <br />expansion to the left, septic system limits <br />expansion to the front, garage and building height <br />limitation limits the expansion to the right or <br />upward . <br />5. Staff recommends that applicant be requested to <br />address how he v/i 11 handle the home occupation <br />problems on this property. <br />6. Applicant must provide a to-sca 1 e sot of plans <br />or revised plans for future review (existing plans <br />filea are 1" = 4.3', not v/orkable scale), and must <br />provide an updated survey verifying the location of <br />the garage. <br />7. Applicant must provide acceptable justification <br />for the height variance or redesign to eliminate <br />same.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.