My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-04-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
05-04-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2024 3:05:42 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 3:03:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
vjr;>fcg.i <br />To: <br />Subject <br />Mayor Grabek <br />Orono Council Members <br />*^°r’ission Chairman Kelley <br />CltC Commission Members ^Cxty Administrator Bernhardson <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator <br />February 10, 1987 <br />^aiuncer^lubii^HSIring"”"" Shadywood Road - <br />are submitted to postpone variance review until revised plans <br />would be unable^to^proceed staff to advise that he <br />thtrih^ residence because the f^ndation ^Ja^s addition to the <br />comniol''’® time to center the Str,f®r "'"'Stable, staff noted <br />foundation was to be installf^ri^f^^^^® property if a <br />The applicant also advised that L wichii the enclosed survey^! <br />?el^^^? <3esignating^the avj ”rage s^e^tbrck^l • survey would have to be <br />lakAch^®^ structure. Mr. Johnston has setbacks for thelakeshore second story deck nf^Jl ° discussed a desire for a <br />applicant was advised that «3uoh a eiy 12 feet in width The* <br />lakeshore setback ^ have to also meet the averagi <br />Note for Review, Consideration, C <br />review of the Schai*i^application""it^"/^ conclusions resulting from the <br />variance applications when \ second of staff to require <br />portion of a structure that is ‘=® installed over^th^t <br />“““If.®!®® require variances !f an alditio" ’^ required yard area. sta?fexisting s -.bstandard setback line Mot-a an extension along an <br />be required if a prooertv had ai* a that a variance review would r»ne <br />encroachment of the strifcture into^? received variance approval for the <br />approval was not conditioneron eh. t V^rd area, and, if, that <br />horizontal expansion. specific prohibition of vertical or <br />Planning Commission Action: <br />the until <br />•J • H 11 lent
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.