Laserfiche WebLink
p-' <br />To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:October 15, 1987 <br />Subject: #1212 Paul Boyke, 793/795 North Ferndale Road - <br />Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing <br />(Note: Applicants are out of town and will not be present but rea«'.est <br />Planning Commission review of this application.) <br />Application - Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement to accommodate <br />existing driveway location. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map (See Exhibit G) <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey With Proposed Division <br />Exhibit E - Applicant's Letter of Request <br />Exhibit F - Photos of the Area <br />Exhibit G - Plat Map of Surrounding Neighborhood Showing General <br />Pattern of Development <br />Exhibit H - Staff Sketches of Various Options to Accomplish <br />Applicant's Purpose While Maintaining the Frontage For <br />Lot 2 <br />Exhibit I - Sketch of Tree and Driveway Locations (Survey to be <br />Provided Monday) <br />Pertinent Facts - <br />1. Applicant found in creating the driveway to serve Lot 1, Block 1 that <br />in order to save trees which exist on Outlot A as a buffer, his new <br />driveway would have to be located north of Outlot A. In order to sell Lot <br />2 with the existing house without the need for a driveway easement, <br />applicant is proposing to add a portion of property north of Outlot A and <br />north of the flag portion of Lot 1, to Lot 1 as shown on Exhibit D. <br />2. Staff would note that under applicant's proposed scheme. Lot 2 will no <br />longer abut Outlot A and will not have frontage on property dedicated for <br />future roadway. Staff suggests that there are other potential methods to <br />accomplish applicant's needs which are: 1) Gain additional acreage for <br />Lot 1; and 2) Place the driveway serving Lot 1 entirely within Lot 1 and/ <br />or within Outlot A and not on Lot 2. Exhibit H-1 shows a scheme whereby <br />Outlot A is extended an additional 35' to the north and becomes a total 60' <br />corridor until the mid point of the cul-de-sac. The 60' corridor then <br />becomes part of Lot 1 as it moves westerly. Applicant suggests that while <br />this would be feasible it does not accomplish his purpose of increasing the <br />acreage for Lot 1 as much as possible.