My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
10-19-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2024 1:58:51 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 1:53:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1207 <br />October 15, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />Application <br />Property Owners List <br />Plat Map <br />Building Permit for Restoration of Retaining Wall <br />Profile of Wall <br />Ordinance F, Second Series <br />Cook's Letter Dated 10/12/87 <br />Site Plan <br />Survey <br />Review of Application - ^ <br />On August 26, 1987, staff issued a permit for the rebuilding of <br />retaining walls within applicant's lakeshore yard per authority given to <br />staff in Ordinance 39. The ordinance did not allow’ restoration of <br />structures other than retaining walls within the lakeshore protected area. <br />The request to build decks and shed shall be considered new construction <br />within the lakeshore yard. <br />The applicant notes the following hardships: <br />1. Steep topography/slopes; <br />2. Need to provide storage for boating equipment, etc. rather than <br />carry up the steep bank each time. <br />Staff notes the following upon site inspection of the property: <br />1. Applicant already has excessive amounts of hardcover within 75- <br />250' zone setback area. <br />2. Applicant has been provided flat, terraced area within the 1-75' <br />setback area with the construction of retaining walls. <br />3. Applicant has not requested a stair/access to the lake, such <br />structure must be limited to 4' width stair with safety steps limited <br />to 4'x4'. <br />4. A lock box structure may be considered by the Planning Commission <br />for security reasons. If hardship is acceptable maintain standards of <br />the code for lakeshore lots divided by roadway - 48 inches maximum <br />height and limited to 20 s.f. <br />Staff cannot find adequate hardships to support request for deck and <br />must recommend denial of 14'xl0' deck. There is adequate flat terraced <br />areas already available to applicant. If Planning Commission finds the <br />security need valid and hardship has been demonstrated, your motion should <br />limit the storage structure to a lock box, maintained e.t 48” in height and <br />not to exceed 20 s.f. in area. Planning Commission may consider asking for <br />a matching reduction in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area (20-j0-;>u <br />S • if • ) •Applicant must also be advised in your motion that access stairway is <br />limited to 4 feet width and safety step to 4'x4'.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.