My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
10-19-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2024 1:58:51 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 1:53:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/D <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Jeanne A. Mabuoth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />October 13, 1987 <br />#1205 Robert Maxfield, 4175 North Shore Drive - <br />Renewal Variance - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - LR-IB <br />Pertinent Ordinance - <br />Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) <br />Lot Area: <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Variance <br />43.560 s.£. <br />20,000 s.f. <br />23.560 s.f. <br />(1.0 acres) <br />(. 46 acres) <br />(.54 acres) <br />Lot Width: <br />Required = 140' <br />Existing = 100' <br />Variance =40' or 28.5% <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Application <br />Property Owners List <br />Plat Map <br />Original Paclcet <br />Resolution #2079 <br />The variances were originally approved by Council on November 10, <br />1986; variance approve 1 expires in one year. The app1 ication involved <br />five (separate tax descriptions' commonly owned adjacent parcels. T!ie <br />applicant sought to create 2 building sites. The one site would retain che <br />existing house on .57 acres on Lots 51, 52 and part of Lot^ 53 ani the <br />remaining building site would consist of .46 acres. The findings and <br />hardships in support of the variances are listed in the enclosed <br />resolution. The factual findings have not changed nor would the conditions <br />of approval. <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />To recommend approval of the renewal variance application of Robert <br />Maxfield finding no changes in the factual findings of the first review, <br />such approval is subject to conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution <br />(Exhibit E).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.