Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1177 <br />August 11, 1987 <br />Page 2 <br />has advised that even with the original plan, involving use of <br />the existing house that the partial walkout was planned. The <br />applicant could have argued that the variance to Section 10.55 <br />Subdivision 8 would have allowed the additional excavation for <br />the partial walkout. The Difficulty for the applicant is that the <br />excavation involves major drainage alterations and alteration of <br />lakeshore banks that clearly were not required because of the <br />walkout. Review Exhibit L, the underground tile that carried <br />drainage from the rear to the lakeshore was removed and a swale <br />along the north side of the house was installed to maintain <br />runoff from 5+ acre watershed to east or rear of property. <br />Drainage did not drain to the rear basin as originally assumed <br />but drained through Waters and neighbors to the north drainage <br />tiles directly to lake. The staff would agree with Mr. <br />Kopischke, applicant's project planner that the City finds a <br />grassed swale method for conveyance of ground water far superior <br />to underground tile conveyance. Staff should add that Mr. <br />Kopischke's assistance was sought by applicant after staff <br />stopped all work on land alterations within lakeshore yard and <br />advised of the need for a conditional use permit. <br />There were other instances when staff could have been made aware <br />of the alterations proposed by the applicant outside of the <br />building elevations submitted with plan. A copy of a page from <br />the building permit application procedure has been enclosed <br />Exhibit F. Note item 2 - "changes in grade or drainage require <br />plans showing existing and proposed contours or grades." In <br />Exhibit E, staff sought an updated survey showing realigned house <br />and all other improvements. Review Exhibit H, the survey <br />submitted as most updated survey, the house has been realigned - <br />but note the section of principal structure adjacent to deck - <br />this does not exist. Also note the concrete step has been <br />relocated in front of new deck area. There was no access shown <br />from deck with the review of Application #1129 and yet the house <br />elevations (exhibits I & J) show extensive stairs network from <br />deck area. Stairs or concrete step as plans designate must be <br />relocated to south side of deck and out of protected area to <br />minimize impact and reduce need for elevated stairs structure <br />because of the more graduated elevations at south edge of deck. <br />If access to lakeshore is required, grade level steps can be <br />installed within existing banks with txeated ties. <br />Mr. Dennis has withdrawn his participation in the applxcation. <br />Mr. Dennis wishes only to have the existing elevations tapered <br />along his property line. <br />Please review Mr. Kopischke's report. Exhibit K, that summarizes <br />the applicant's plan to improve treatment of surface drainage. <br />The ’’eport also lists supportive findings that would call for <br />approval of the grading and drainage plans included with his