Laserfiche WebLink
Od 1<> 9-3 12: FA\ <br />;ms a '33 1S‘-5C <br />Fa.\-L775 <br />FROM ONE SEUEN CN“ ZERO PAGE.00^ <br />Kevin Staunton, Esq. <br />Karen cole, Ecq. <br />jxine 9, l9‘93 <br />page 3 <br />. =l*an,ln, 1^. a..anti.l ewrartar of ti.e <br />neighborhood. <br />variances to e^cpire. <br />Hr. Jeppia ’ ® ‘^of J2 <br />SXd^G ^reasoS>lS*^^f^^^ 2Ss^ Misit. because there is a r vith )CBowlodge that it wasnot aet OMiien ourchased the out that wbeto a <br />because Hr. zaopio neglects to Granting <br />muni^olpallty ^ done), ^eecifiee 12 spccifxca variance (as '^r 5 10.08, subd. 3, epec^ before a• « well. Orono Ordinance i ^v. , applicable) o«ic*« • <br />‘Hfssf'caTS .IStSoW^^MuSirS. TB. orono ot««»ards aro “ <br />.. d«:d MO 1 "«■« proi«r«y 1" SStleSo*^UW^ » «>«Standard ho. l- under conditions aiioaea wj <br />a reasonable use ix u»«» <br />oifieial controls. <br />,^,.i.. 1^ X. c» v«y ci^iy^ ^ ^ '“*SSS"SiS^ <br />In conjaneti^ Witt IseM, eabi^ . ***SS <br />l»gs. g^oasonablo w tt c^iiw eltv <br />cases M.W.Zd 824 (Hinn.App- noted that without <br />„h4« the court orooerty.invSlvi“SSon ^.WP, tto ?;^onSro u« *“ <br />a variance, th^ 173 ^iiJ^fwind that <br />Similarly, ^^S^^r^Tzappla, --the <br />another case cit^ K^i^eenc?# of a wi^» the lot <br />SS 521 ?^Fxy under cannon own i, au. to <br />Stend^d HO - ^„’^”S..ted H. tt. <br />circumstances unique <br />lando%mer." "It juj applicant <br />notice or rxw constitute n onlttedj