Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MAY 24, 1993 <br />(#7) #1691 & #1702 CITY OF LONG LAKE, <br />130 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD - FINAL SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3284 <br />Kelley inquired about the landscape plan and a provision in the <br />covenants to ensure the plantings will be installed. <br />Staunton replied there are provisions within the covenant that <br />would allow Orono to obtain an injunction and to take litigation <br />to enforce if such violations are determined. <br />Mayor Callahan suggested the City should contact Long Lake • ^ ^ <br />provision is not being adhered to prior to litigation. He said the <br />City of Orono will be the primary party to enforce the covenant, <br />not the residents, and added the covenants are perpetual. <br />KeI ley questioned the time frame for the landscape screening to <br />occur. <br />Moorse replied as the properties are developed, screening will be <br />planted. <br />It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt <br />Resolution #3284 for Application #1691 and #1702 the City of Long <br />Lake, 130 Orono Orchard Road, approving the planned residential <br />development and plat of rieming Trail. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#8) #1734 JOHN BURGER, <br />3750 BAYSIDE ROAD - FINAL SUBDIVISION <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to table action on <br />Application #1734 John Burger, 3750 Bayside Road, at the request <br />of staff, pending receipt of the required easement documents. <br />(#9) #1811 C. JACK REMIEN, <br />3237 CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCES <br />Mr. Remien was present. <br />Gaffron explained this is a request for a third oj! ® <br />variance for lot area and width originally approved In 1984. When <br />the original variance was granted the property was owned in common <br />by the property owner to the north. The property is in a hal <br />zoning district, and contains 77* of the area requirement, and 55* <br />of the lot width. The Planning Commission voted in this <br />on a vote of 3 to 2. A question has been raised about the <br />consistency with the DNR shoreland regulations.