My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
06-14-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2023 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
12/29/2023 2:31:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File <>1825 <br />May 12. 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />not meet the required area standards of thc^ LR-IB zoning district. Alternate B would meet all <br />required LR-IB zoning standards. Hardcover excesses exist within proposed Lot 1 with either <br />Alternate A or B. Unfortunately, hardcover facts have been provided without a plan of all <br />existing hardcover improvements. Staff will ask that the hardcover site plan be submitted by <br />your review at the May 17th meeting. At the time of a subdivision, the City reviews for <br />confonnance with all pertinent ordinances. Applicant has an excess of hardcover and has <br />presented no hardships. On your site inspection, note the excessive parking and apron area <br />adjacent to the garage. Some 910 s.f. of existing improvements must be removed if Lot 1 is to <br />meet the hardcover limiution of 25%. Suff should also note that Lot 1 as proposed in Alternate <br />B would have an excess of hardcover within the 250-500* setback area. It would be ' ^sier to <br />develop hardships for the access drive within the narrow corridor of the lot located w in the <br />250-500* setback area. Alternate B is the acceptable alternative for subdivision as Alternate A <br />involves an excessive lot area variance. <br />Access <br />The City Engineer has asked that a shared access be required rather than a separate <br />access for Lot 2 at Shore Hills Road. Shore Hills Road is a private road. Lot 2 does have <br />adequate width adjacent to Shore Hills Road (200->-*). If a shared access is required by City, <br />the City must grant an area variance for proposed Lot 1 with Alternate B because area of <br />easement in favor of Lot 2 would be excluded from Lot I’s area. The request for a shared <br />access is consistent with City’s policy to eliminate additional cuih cuts on roadways. The shared <br />access may be limited to the existing curb cut area at Shore Hills Road and minimize impact on <br />lot area of Lot 1. <br />Sewer/Water <br />Review Exhibit D. Sewer is located within lakeshore yard. This is the only sewer line <br />that can function for this property. It will be necessary to mstall the access Ime along the west <br />side yard of Lot 1. Appropriate easement would have to be developed over Lot 1 in favor of <br />Lot 2. Note utility easements are not excluded from areas of lots. <br />Water shall be provided from the service on Shore Hills Road to the immediate east. <br />Future developer of Lot 2 shall be responsible for payment of a sewer unit at $10.954 .20 and <br />wate* jnit at $1,877.00 based on current fee schedule upon application for a building permit. <br />Lot Configuration <br />Although all accessory improvements have not been shown on preliminary survey, the <br />majority of accessory improvements exclusive of the drive are located within the lakeshore yard. <br />The accessory shed is located at the shared lot line in Alternate B and if approved must be <br />removed prior to final plat approval as it does not meet the required 10* setback from the newly <br />proposed lot line
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.