Laserfiche WebLink
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmember:; <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />May 11. 1993 <br />#1825 Thomas L. McCarthy, 2490 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision, <br />Class in - Conditional Use * Public Hearing <br />The applicant proposes a two-lot division of the 2 + acre parcel. Mr. McCarthy provides <br />two alternative plans for development. Alternates A and B. Applicant’s preference is Alternate <br />A. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review; <br />2. <br />3. <br />Section 11.03, Definition 66. Class DI Subdivision. <br />Section 11.03, Defmition 24. Lot Area Minimum. In urban areas served by <br />sanitary sewer, each lot must comain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the <br />minimum areas as prescribed in the Zoning Chap^ of the City Code or half- <br />acre. whichever is less, (exclusive of public and private rights-of-way. vehicular <br />or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any <br />wetland or lake) and have legal access to the building site without encroachmem <br />of a wetland or flood plain area. <br />Alternate A. preferred by applicant, requires access easements through Lot 2 in <br />favor of Lot 1. Area of access easement would have to be excluded from dry <br />buildable area of Lot 2. There b clearly not enough area within Lot 2 to provide <br />an easement without also having the City approve area variances. The City does <br />not grant area variances with the creation of new lots. <br />Section 10.02, Defmition 43 (B). Lot Width. For lots which abut a lake or <br />tributary at the shoreline measured in a straight line between the points at which <br />the side lot lines intersect the ordinary high water level (9W.4) and at the <br />required structure setback from the OHWL measured in a straight line between <br />the points of intersection of the side lot lines with the structural setback Ime. For <br />Lake Mitmetonka, a General Development Lake, the setback b 75 . <br />Alternatives A and B show Lot 1 as meetmg the requued lot width standards. <br />Note there is only one lakeshore lot proposed with the two-lot subdivbkm. Lot <br />2 will be non-riparian to Lake Minnetonka. As lot width b measured at the <br />lakeshore and at the 75 ’ setback line. Lot 1 may be planed as a fUg lot with a 20’ <br />wide corridor without requiring a lot width variance. (Lot width b measured at <br />the 35' street setback for the non-lakeshore lot.)