06-14-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1825 June 10, 1993 Page 2 75-250’ setback area = 27.100 s.f. Original proposal = 8,588 s.f. or 31.69% Amended proposal « 6,410 s.f. or 23.65% 250-500’ setback area = 2,600 s.f. Existing = 1,700 s.f. or 65.38% Amended proposal » 1,520 s.f. or 58.46% If the City was to consider hardcover based on the area between the 75’ and 500 setback, hardcover would be reviewed as follows: Total area * 29,700 s.f. Allowed * 7,425 s.f. or 25% Proposed = 8,110 s.f. or 27.3% Hardcover excess * 685 s.f. or 2.3% The applicant would have to remove 685 s.f. of existing haidrover to meet the 25% allowance under this format. Applicant should determine if be can mnmuin hardcover at the allowed 7,425 s.f. or 25% or will he need the additional area of the property to support needed improvements. Many of the adjacent neighbors turned out to protest the proposed subdivision. They were concerned over what they foresee as a major negative impact on their neighborhood. They noted the condition and limits of the private road. Sborehills Ro^, and potential hazards for the users of the roadway. Sborehills Road was platted in 1941 and is served from Old Beach R^. It will be applicant’s responsibility to provide written confirmation that legal access is provided to the new lot. It is doubtftil that covenants for a subdivision approved in 1941 would still be in effect but the City would have to ask for confirmation as a condhion of final subdivision approval. It would also be the applicant’s responsibility to provide documents that the ftiture tot owner would be responsible for an equal share in the maimenance and upkeep of the pnvate road. Tree removal was a major concern. The property is covered with manu^lantings. If the property is to be developed, it will require the removal of several mature trees. The City has no regulations over tree removal except for the area within the 0-75’ setback area. Drainage was another concern. The neighbors felt that to place a house on this portiM of the property will impact drainage in the area. The City f igineen were asked to go out ^ inspect the area to determine what impact new residential construction wUI have on the ii^iate watershed. The City Engineer wUI be able to respond to any drainage concerns at the meeting.