Laserfiche WebLink
B. The former detached garage was located 1 ’2" from the side lot line and <br />the new structure will be located 10*. <br />C. The proposed improvemem will result in a reduction of hardcover. <br />D. If garage was placed parallel to street meeting the 10* side and street <br />setback, a large maple tree would have to be removed. <br />E. If proposed garage was to meet the 30* street setback, the 10 ’ separation <br />setback between principal structure and detached structure could not be <br />met. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the fmdings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above fmdings, the Orono City Council hereby <br />grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) to permit the <br />construction of a 24’x24 ’ detached garage within the street yard of the lakeshore lot to be located <br />15 ’ from the street m line instead of the required 30*. subject to the following conditK •JIV <br />Page 2 of 5