Laserfiche WebLink
r. X r r - ^ ^ <br />t'!3. Jeann6 A. M^fcusch/ Sonins Ac.iur.i2trawwr <br />Pa-ge 2 <br />The cuesticn of financial gain foe iKyaelf is miniral ’-’hen one ccnsicera <br />f^«hased t;ne loi in 19SS f=r saO,CCO a=i _i; £lv. <br />vi.*ra later for $95»000 less real ea^'iffce ccrmisaicna. xn ac^it^cn/ <br />rwl eaiaf taxes baaed cn that lot as being build^le. <br />Without a renewed variance; I would be subjected to a ser-cus nanc <br />lose cn the property. <br />In closing; there are two final comments which do impact the request <br />for denial of this variance: <br />Tn 1986 and 1987; variances were passed without objections from <br />BieiL. What is different is that today Bielke also has his res-dence <br />for sale. <br />2) At the present time; I have qualified buyers and signed purchase <br />agreements not only for Lot 18; but also Lot 19. <br />Approval of this variance would be greatlymyself; but also by the two qualified b.’.yers who are scheduled to close <br />on May 28, 1993. <br />Respectfully submitted