My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
06-15-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2023 2:48:09 PM
Creation date
12/28/2023 2:44:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i VILLAGE OF ORONORegular Meeting of the Planning Commission, <br />June 7, 1971 <br />The Planning Comnission mot on the above <br />date with the following members present: <br />Chairman Poisson, Butler, Elliott, Gasch, <br />Herfurth, Kulilemeier, Kullberg, Nicholls, <br />and Southworth. Absent: Dongoske. <br />Herman Vanderborght represented himself on <br />a division of 2.90 acres from an 11.92 acre <br />parcel. Parcel 1560, Section 31. He explained <br />he was selling all his property but the 2.90 <br />acre parcel which contained his residence; <br />also, that one man was buying all the previous <br />parcels divided off including the remainder <br />after this division. When the matter of the <br />extra R* along Chippewa Lane cane up, ho <br />stated he would either dedicate the 8* or <br />give an easement thereto. <br />Kullberg moved, Southworth seconded, to <br />reconnend approval of the division, ’lotion. <br />Ayes (9) - Nays (0). <br />Lloyd Draper represented himself in a lot <br />size and frontage variance on Lots 16 and <br />19, Fagomess, explaining that althouth <br />the lots were contiguous, they did not lend <br />themselves to a good combination as they <br />fronted on different streets. His plans <br />\;oro to build now homes on both lots and <br />i/)icn questioned said they would be for sale. <br />In view of tiie assessments on both lots <br />and the new assessment coming for water <br />and that service was available to both lots. <br />Kuhlemoier moved, Nicholls seconded, that <br />approval be recommended, but all setback <br />requirements for construction would have to <br />be met. Motion, Ayes (9) • Nays (0). <br />... ... w*7:30 F.M. <br />Attorney Robert llarriman reprosonced the <br />opposition to a proposed street vacation <br />of the end 5* of Rest Point Rond by presenting <br />a petition of 17 signatures pretesting tho <br />vacation, and stating that any closing of <br />the above would bring a property-value <br />depreciation as the beach was an amenity to <br />their property. Albert Sand also spoke <br />along the sane lines. <br />Kuhlemoier moved, Elliott seconded, that a <br />recommendation be made that the status of <br />the access remain unchanged. Motion, <br />Ayes (9) - Nays (0). <br />DIVISION <br />Chippewa Lane <br />BUILDABLE LOTS <br />Fagerness Point <br />STREET VACATION <br />Rost Point Road
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.