02-17-1987 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1103 February 12, 1987 Page 2 of 3 Staff asked if the applicant has any idea how much fill exists today over the dump and he estimated anywhere from 6 to 8 inches to approximately 2 feet of fill. After a day of dumping it was Eisinger's practice to place 6 to 8 inches Ox clean fill over the new dump area. The weather is fine for a site inspection - park to the west of the Eisinger house at the old access to the dump site. Access to the dump site begins at the drive. Review of Application: Mr. Eisinger plans to fill the 12 acre former dump site with approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill obtained from the 1-394 upgrading. The contractor has submitted a letter (Exhibit E), advising of their willingness to assist the City in the review of this permit. The fill will be placed 26+ feet from the surrounding wetlands. The engineer has preliminarily discussed The use of an erosion control barrier installed at the 26 feet setback line a minimum 5-10 feet wide zone. Review Exhibits G, H, & I, fill will be placed up to the 990 elevation (same elevation as Highway 12). Fill placements will range from 8' to 4' depths. Debris and building materials must be removed from site prior to filling. As the contractor's letter states, filling period will extend through the winter of 1987-88. In 1974, with the application for a demolition landfill (dump for building materials, etc.), Eisinger submitted a hydrogeologic study, soil borings, surveys, topographic survey, etc. This material has been submitted to the City Engineer's office for review. Per the engineer's preliminary report. Exhibit L, Lynch advises that five agencies must review the proposal prior to City action. That list has been enclosed for your information (Exhibit K). Staff has asked Mr. Eisinger what is his intent or proposed use of the fill area after completion outside of the obvious financial gain. The applicant's response was that he would like to either use it for agricultural purposes or possibly a "driving range". Staff explained that the area would not be adaptable to rural residential development nor the roads associated with such development. Unfortunately, the engineer's preliminary report has not referenced the materials submitted by the applicant. As a lay person in such matters, staff will expect specific directives from the engineering staff once the various reviewing agencies have completed their review. !